![]() |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
how come there was never a symbian phone runnin on an armv7 processor?
i say this because web browsing on the symbians phones is horrendous. nokia should have gotten a special processor made with a simple arm core with another arm v7 core. one for most simple tasks and another for web browsing and such. achieving best battery life while getting great performance. |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
selling something you believe in with passion for a company with integrity, now that is easy. |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
that's a good way of looking at it!:eek: |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
espresso cup <=> popularity / fan-base how many ppl use LostDOS imMobilized in your country (how many of the ppl who told you they got hit have (or ever had...) one? even if they can increase there market share by 100% (at what cost?), that's still going to be twice nothing... alas, for NOKIA :( |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
...I'm swearing, the longer i have to read quite childish terms like 'LostDOS imMobilized' / 'LostDOS Paralyzed' and colorized characters / company / brand names (i thought this had been getting better in the meantime!?), someone will hit the killfile AGAIN.
|
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If it did, even if we take a starting point of v.34 modems when the most nooks were ironed out, in 1994 we had 28.8 kb/s (bauds, but let's roughly translate them to bits), we'd all be sporting 120Mbps connections now. For WiFi the stats are even grimmer - in 2000 we had 802.11b with 11Mbps rate, so if the Moore's law worked we'd all be having 45Gbps WiFi connections now. And I'm not even calculating the availability and general demand that makes deploying such networks, especially wireless ones with their limited frequencies and interference, next to impossible. To move everything to the cloud and still have a wireless access to it, we'd need to move the frequencies a couple notches up to the X-ray spectrum as radio waves cannot simply pack that much data. It's a physical limitation, not a technological one. And then you have the issue of creating a server (farm) fast enough to serve all those terminals with such high demands, which means you'd have to build a couple of nuclear power plants next to it just to supply it with a juice, and probably put it on Arctic as there's just no way to cool off so much processing at one centralized location... No matter how optimized the solution might be, it just cannot work... Those who dream of clouds providing them with the processing power that their localized hardware is providing don't know the first thing about physics, electronics, telecommunications and general computing. Sure, as an experimental setup it can appear amazing, but connect 1B people to it and you'll see what is a clusterf.ck of gargantuan proportions. |
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
Quote:
|
Re: Nokia CEO Blames Salesmen For Windows Phone Struggles
agree with your post's general idea(s) as well as most examples [...]
have however one point where i beg to differ, namely networking respectively speed thereof: Quote:
the few users that do actual number crunching, Computer Assisted tasks (CAx) or the like can still get a "fat computer" and connect to the (Citrix) network for office tasks. Quote:
with ADSL i'd be stuck @ 20Mbps, but this isn't a technological limit (2010 stats) , it is administrative rubbish (Moore’s Law and Communications) this is simply the result of monopolistic markets (national carriers / providers) where entering is difficult; and the administrative decrees that competitors have to be allowed don't do the trick, as (in the mobile market) T-Mobile's efforts to leave the US market prove. nota-bene: in South-Korea, the available speeds are not a consequence of competition but of the government giving the national operator the mission to provide that service the same situation (i.e. dominant position in the market) that made NOKIA feel very comfortable until it was too late. when Apple started the iPhone and Google followed suit with Android, they simply had no idea what to do... they kept doing what they had been doing for years, releasing Symbian (or Maemo) devices with outstanding hardware, but not up to market's expectations. and then, Flopocalypse... Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:35. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8