![]() |
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
|
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
|
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
This openess on the desktop triggers all sorts of unexpected results, because the vendors are not controlling the applications. So now, the RIAA and MPAA are going crazy trying to shut down millions of average teenagers and grandmothers casually downloading the latest music and movies. Telcos and cable companies are falling over each other to offer VoIP and IPTV services, because people are already helping themselves to these things in significant, scary numbers and they want a piece of the pie. What I'm trying to say (and others here, too) is that the N900 will bring the desktop paradigm to the mobile market. The vendors will no longer control the apps, and all hell will break loose. Well, hell for vendors, heaven for consumers. |
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
|
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
|
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
(I'll go hand in my geek card now, for not thinking of that first.) I think BT still goes fine here on U network, and I've got substantial 3AM bandwidth... UBERSEED! |
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
But first this is not new. Symbian and WinCE/mobile are also similar to the desktop paradigm. You can write your own applications for them. You can buy applications for them. The vendors do not control those applications. (Interestingly, neither WinCE/mobile nor Symbian succeeded in creating a decent market for applications. In a fraction of the time, the iPhone did.) Second, I am not really sure that the N900 will be as open as you think. Dr. Ari Jaaksi had puzzling comments on the "necessities for open source developers to embrace paradigms necessary to the phone industry like drm and closed source". Furthermore, you have been intoxicated by the PC/windows/linux model. Everyone here seem to ignore that a smartphone may be a computing platform, but it is not a pc. The pc model emerged in the 90s, before the Internet was popular, and the technological choices which were made at the time reflect that (and we all know what disastrous consequences some of those choices had). A smartphone, with limited battery and computing ressources, always on connectivity, high hardware variability, high bug resilience and designed for a market of non-specialists implies different choices. If you want to make some money, that is. ;) You may want to read this article for details. It is mainly advocating the iPhone against the google Android platform, but the arguments adapt to maemo as well. So: close, but no cigar. I still do not see the N900 being revolutionary at all. It is just another smartphone. One with great hardware specs, but htc already knows how to do that. One with a voip client, but this is old news. One which runs linux, but htc, motorola and google already do that. You have nice freeware for it (and my thanks go to those developers!), but no commercial applications, so the choice is limited and not really adapted to the general public. Sorry, I still do not see this as a revolution, a new computing platform or even a platform with any future relevance. |
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
b) The whole point of Maemo is (again, I'm citing Ari Jaaksi) to bring desktop technology to the mobile device segment (which I think is the really revolutionary part here). If you don't like the desktop approach, then it's not the right toy for you. |
Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8