![]() |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
The n900 is an internet tablet first, theN why include SMS? Why include a feature if you ate going to half *** it? I'd rather not have it at all than have to wonder what could have been. Say what you want about apple, thy respond to consumer needs. MMS then multitasking. Nokia on the other hand... |
Re: iPhone 4
Ok I set up a thread for constructive ideas on features to make the n900 successor a competitive phone given all the talk about the iphone 4:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...875#post705875 What are your three changes or steps to make the n900 successor a decent purchase/alternative? |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
It took apple 3 years to include multitasking, finally in the 4th iteration of the os and is not quite true multitasking. If it was up to them, they would have not included it. It is pointless to call it a smartphone without multitasking. The competition has forced them, not consumers. Apple differs in their method, but they do manage to bring attention due to this. |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
Ps: iPhone apps are pretty much the cheapest 'smartphone apps' around due to their large and active marketsize. Compare any titles available on both iPhone and n900 for clear proofs (angry birds, 3d coaster series, etc) |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
Quote:
But at the same time, the device is open enough that fMMS could come into existence. So you can have MMSes while I continue to not use them, and save the memory/space the software would otherwise have occupied. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8