![]() |
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
Especially with the number of programmers that quit cos elop decoded it was better to put all eggs in one untested, declare the rest as dead OSes. If i was a developer and one os which i have been a part of developing is called a dead os and this is scrapped, i would not be very excited. Especially because by your own definition, im working on a dead os. |
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
N900 was out in 2009. Any serious company would have already been working on a sequel. elop made his decisions at the beginning of 2011. Lack of optimization has nothing to do with Elop. It has to do with previous leadership and engineering. None of the Nokia phones are optimized. Ever use N8? Oh my, what a non-optimized fiasco was that
|
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
http://meego.gitorious.org/meegotouc...commits/master I HATE ELOP! |
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
|
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
|
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
The beauty of N9 is the open operating system and it works great on T-Mo USA. |
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
|
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
what a shame. And you can still buy the original Galaxy S upgraded to 1.4ghz.
|
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
Quote:
If the transmitter was working I may still still get one, though holding out to see what the Pureview 808 is like. Symbian still turns me off though.. |
Re: N9 PR1.3 by end of May'12
I wish more workout on front camera, such as, ability to switch to front camera, native video call if possible..
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8