![]() |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Quote:
From my understanding, all Bluetooth 2.0 has EDR, as it is a specification built-in. "Bluetooth 2.0 a.k.a. Bluetooth 2.0+EDR (Enhanced Data Rate) offers a significant speed bump over its predecessor. While Bluetooth 1.2 offers a data transfer rate of 1Mbps, Bluetooth 2.0 is 3 times faster boasting a data transfer speed 3Mbps" |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
According to Wikipedia, at least, "Bluetooth 2.0" is not a valid designation. BT2 requires EDR, but the only official labeling is "Bluetooth 2.0+EDR". Some devices labeled "Bluetooth 2.0" are proper 2.0 with EDR, and some aren't.
|
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
I can't believe nobody has mentioned the sprint sero plan. Go to www.sprint.com/sero and use the e-mail address savings@sprintemi.com with a valid zipcode.
$30 a month for 500 minutes of voice and unlimited data. Get a windows mobile phone and pdanet for ~$30 bucks one time cost for the program and you are golden. I don't know about any of the regular phones and BT DUN. |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Quote:
As for BT DUN. The newer WiMo phones are not coming with the profile (from what i've read), PAN only. There is a PAN hack though for the NIT, but i've never used it. |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Quote:
|
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Quote:
One thing to keep in mind - most of Nokia 3g with HSDPA cabale phones are for European frequencies (850/2100) and when used in US with 1900 frequency (as is AT&T) it will fall back to UMTS or Edge and not use the HSDPA capability at all. I went to the US Nokia store and they only have 2 phones with US 3G support - the N95-3 US version and the N75 (which is only UMTS and not HSDPA). There is another US version about to be released sometime - the N78 and the E66 I believe, but untill its released we have to wait on Nokia phones. I use a normal MediaNet with UMTS over the N75 (specifically bought a used and a little broken N75 from eBay for data connectivity) and it it much faster than my older Edge suported phone. I would love to have true US supported HSDPA 3.5G though (over 1900 frequency in case of AT&T network). Using a high-end data plan (high price) with a low end phone where you essentially fall back on edge speeds (due to frequency mismatch) is no good. I would rather take a low end data plan first (MediaNet) and get a high speed phone (true 3G) which will be more fruitfull. |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Currently i'm using MediaNet and a Sony Ericsson K850i (3.6Mb/s HSDPA). Download tests have revealed i'm getting at most times 800-1000KB/s down. You also have to realize since it's still packet switched and not true "always online", it does take a few moments to initially send the request and then receive a response from a website. One thing that would make the pages load faster is obviously a faster processor in the NIT. There are also some tweaks to the browser config one can try also.
*I would be interested to see what other combinations others have used/use and their experiences. |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
As I understand it, MEdia Net requires use of a proxy for connectivity.
Does that mean things like IMAP, RDP, SSH, etc wouldn't be available? Mike |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
The maps show lots o 3G in my area.
I can't tell if it's HSDPA though. Mike |
Re: Cellular Internet connectivity - best performance
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8