![]() |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
Though, that's starting to sound an awful lot like what the Buglabs project is for. I don't remember if they have battery and storage modules, though. That and a PCMCIA or ExpressCard module would probably be enough for _me_. |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
b) someone already makes a "build a SATA SSD from (SD or CF?) cards" device. Plug that into it, and you've got your card array. |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Would a fit-PC do? I found it on Engadget.com
It has a 500MHz Geode and runs on 12V. Price w/WIFI but no HD is $245. W/WIFI, 60GB HD, and Linux it's $295. |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
That's a better price than the OpenBlockS... hmm...
|
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
They have battery and storage modules proposed, but not already in the works. But they do have some existing storage options. They _are_ working on a GSM module though. |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
If you're going to host game servers on it some are closed source and require x86 (or x86 compatibility). Some also require quite some resources. If this is important maybe Intel Atom is an option. I read today they're going dual-core.
Quake1/2/3 servers are very portable though. I even ran this, with client, on SGI MIPS. :D Enemy Terrirory I don't know, its basically a Q3 mod. I'd also love DVB-H on it because public television broadcasts (similar to the Beeb) on DVB-H are free here (already paid for via tax). |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
Personally, I don't care to support ANY closed source apps for this premise. |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
I'm not sure quite what you meant earlier about revisiting, but I'm gonna take that as a request/license to look at the first post and ramble something ~5 times as long as it. ;) See you in a few! |
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
Quote:
|
Re: The Case for a Pocketable Server
The "Fit PC Slim" is one option that I'm currently looking at, the other would be with a CF configuration instead of the 2.5" HDD slot, but the price points would also be lower (thinking somewhere around $200 with wifi and a small CF, larger CF/HDD/SDD obviously adding more costs). Comparable specs in terms of processors/etc as FitPC (based around the same processor and chipset). Big advantge to this hardware would be that it has a second MiniPCI slot, so if you wanted to add more hardware that's a pretty good expansion option.
I think the external battery pack is a better idea than trying to intergrate it into the device; that way lots of options for size/capacity/etc are available and taken care of. We all know that GA loves his OMAPs, and I'm in no way saying that the Beagle board and OMAP3 systems aren't awesome, but I just can't see them being ready for this sort of application right now, both from a development point of view and from a cost point of view. For the record as far as power consumption goes the x86 Geode equipment is quite conservative; the big difference between it and the OMAP/ARMs is the sleep/low power modes which in this scenario I don't see as a big factor. -Rob |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8