![]() |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
After enabling extra-testing, I noticed that the yellow box started blinking. Xournal and Load-applet had new versions available. I assume from extra-testing side?
While I wait garage registration complete, very very slow, quick notes: Xournal seems to work, thumbs up. Load-app seems to require reboot :-/ My first reboot since getting N900 (been running it two weeks straight). |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
So much to do, so little time. Anyway, fresh pair of eyes now that i distilled that new info into the wiki would be good. We really do need a better/more complete testing guide. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
It would be helpful if the authors of those applications indicated if they were optified or not.
Edit: Some comments on those apps do tell you if it's optified or not. But it would be helpful if it was indicated in the overview itself. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
|
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
What is "optified"? I assume its not "optimized" as everyone seems to use that term.
Clearly, if I don't even know that I should not be alpha/beta testing (see , I do know a couple of geek terms though)! :D |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
|
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
the current solution in place (referred to as "optification") is the second on that page... moving everythign >500kB to /opt. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Is there any sort of list of what tests are considered to have been pased when an app makes it from extras-devel to -testing?
Like is there a battery of automated tests run by Nokia/Maemo that can confirm simple go/no go before Testers start to look at a new build? What having lots of Testers looking at builds should be focused on is finding more in depth issues that a dev might not have anticipated. Aditionally it helps find if something behaves differently than expected on your specific device and configuration. Things like, are all dependencies there or, does an install go to where ALL apps are expected to go should be simple automated entry requirements and Testers should not be expected to have to worry about wasting their valuable time on code that doesn't meet this bar. If this system of testing 'quality gates' doesn't exist now thats fine, but it would be nice to know the Nokia/Maemo plan to provide and how we can help once the resources are available. thanks |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
If you don't I will later. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
Does anyone have a starting point on this. Not sure I will retain my sanity editing it direct on the Wiki but I can do it offline and paste in enbulk I suppose. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8