![]() |
Re: Android is not open
Quote:
I don't know anything about the Nexus. For the CLIQ though.. I do see that one as being a pain. 2 separate downloads, plus a series of flashes and commands that must be entered perfectly... yeah. I don't see average joe enjoying rooting their Cliq very much. While the steps documenting is fairly clear.. and most people should be OK doing it.. well - look around these forums for a bit and you'll see :D. That's one of the things that makes Maemo stand out so much is the ability to root the device so easily. That's also the main reason I argue that it's pointless for root not to be on there by default.. it's so bloody easy to get it that you sure aren't stopping *anybody* from doing it. May as well just be there. |
Re: Android is not open
Quote:
|
Re: Android is not open
Quote:
(Note: I run Super-D ROM off XDA on my G1 - I find it to be more responsive and multi-task friendly than many of cyanogen's :D) |
Re: Android is not open
Quote:
|
Re: Android is not open
Quote:
And for the second part.. I agree partially: It shouldn't void your damn warranty just because you get root :(. That's what's stupid and not "open" about it. |
Re: Android is not open
http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.p...8&cid=31016760
While (most of) Android may be open source and continue to be, it's kernel will not be linux, but rather a fork of it. The definition of "open" is a little murky here, particularly if you're a kernel hacker or a hardware manufacturer. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8