![]() |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
|
Re: really, why no MMS?
....it`s like telling me 'really, not a fax on a modern computer?'
for me MMS is dead, especially when todays phones are capable of emailing the pictures you want!....if I want to send something I send it through email and then an sms to notify the other party to check their email (everybody checks theyr emails at least once a day, so I don`t see the purpose of MMS) |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
it would probably require the code for conversations to be opened though |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
I get mail notifications fine whether the client is open or closed and it has options to pick how often it automatically checks your mail (starting from every 5 minutes up to 2 hours). |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
|
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
t-mobile usa can use epc.t-mobile.com for MMS and internet you do not need to change apn's |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
|
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
Quote:
Also look here. |
Re: really, why no MMS?
For me MMS is important. I live in Japan where the majority of people communicate via "mobile email" which is a phrase to describe, well, emails to mobile phones. With the 3G networks here, mobile email is implemented via MMS. You get an email address assigned to your mobile phone (not POP3) and the emails (i.e. MMS) are pushed to your phone. For SMS, it's possible to use to send simple text only messages to those on the same network as you - this restricting being down to some business reason and not a technical one. So that means the only way to send a message to someone on another network than yours is MMS.
To give you some idea on usage, in the past 3 weeks I have sent 300 MMSs from my phone (not the N900). I think I am an average user in Japan at this rate since I can receive between 0-20 per day (I am not just spamming my friends!). As for just using standard email instead, yes, I wish that was the case. Unfortunately some services will filter out non-mobile originated emails in order to stop spam getting to your phone. I do not know the entire history of the mobile industry here in Japan but I would guess the current usage stems from the early days of messaging when connecting to a POP3/SMTP account wouldn't be feasible technically from a phone. Anyway IMHO, I personally feel that Nokia could either provide more support to the MMS efforts (via fMMS being fully integrated), or, if they feel that MMS is a dead technology, stop incorporating it into all their other products and encourage the whole industry to follow suit. |
Re: really, why no MMS?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8