maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Reason I sold my N900 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=54773)

rickysio 2010-06-01 11:18

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by h3llraz0r (Post 693405)
Another reason why Nokia doesn't bother releasing updates and ditches the phone with pretty much a low number of complaints from this example.

I can prove you wrong on so many levels but I don't like feeding stupidity.

Prove me wrong? Please do try - I'm pretty sure you'd enforce my case instead. Try again, troll.

Low number of complains? Try LOOKING at Bugzilla, noob.

Flandry 2010-06-01 11:23

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Guys, let's all be glad he has moved on and do the same. As he is currently unable to respond to your posts, please don't respond to his directly.

johnel 2010-06-01 11:28

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flandry (Post 693502)
Guys, let's all be glad he has moved on and do the same. As he is currently unable to respond to your posts, please don't respond to his directly.

But I had so many witty responses left.

Ok fair enough - maybe locking the thread or deleting it maybe in order?

etuoyo 2010-06-01 11:31

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickysio (Post 693373)
BWAHAHAHAHA!

I've used my N900 without protection for MONTHS, and the screen is flawless!

I think it is a common error made on this website to assume that because something has not happened to me personally it is a problem that does not exist at all.

I got two very very massive scratches on my screen after only a month and that was despite my treating the device with great care. I think it is very widely accepted that the screen is very prone to scratching although it is probably a problem with resistive screens rather than the N900. That reason alone is enough to make me glad that Nokia is moving away from resistive (in addition to the fact that whether people on here choose to admit it or not) capacitive screens are just so much more responsive.

johnel 2010-06-01 11:39

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by etuoyo (Post 693522)
I think it is a common error made on this website to assume that because something has not happened to me personally it is a problem that does not exist at all.

I got two very very massive scratches on my screen after only a month and that was despite my treating the device with great care. I think it is very widely accepted that the screen is very prone to scratching although it is probably a problem with resistive screens rather than the N900. That reason alone is enough to make me glad that Nokia is moving away from resistive (in addition to the fact that whether people on here choose to admit it or not) capacitive screens are just so much more responsive.

They are two different technologies that solve the problem in different ways - One is not necessarily better than the other.

I like resistive-type touch screens because it allows you to use a stylus thus giving you more accuracy - ideal for paint-type packages, photo-retouching.

Capacitive-type touch screens are more receptive and the added benefit of using a solid cover - e.g. glass.

If the n900 was a capacitive-type screen there is the possibility of shattering the screen and still scratching it.

Flandry 2010-06-01 11:40

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnel (Post 693514)
But I had so many witty responses left.

Ok fair enough - maybe locking the thread or deleting it maybe in order?

Sorry. There are more than enough easy targets around this place; i'm sure you'll find a place to unload them witticisms soon enough.

I would rather not close the thread but will if it seems only the OP himself is the focus of the responses.

On topic: Capacitive certainly can be scratched, but glass is harder than most materials that could be used in resistive screens. I'd still rather have resistive.

gabby131 2010-06-01 11:52

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
the real beauty is in the eye and hands of the beholder......

rickysio 2010-06-01 11:53

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Capacitive can be scratched - and since it IS glass, it becomes much easier to damage by shock than the plastic screen of resistive devices. Glass does have more resistance against scratching, that I'd admit.

etuoyo 2010-06-01 12:11

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by johnel (Post 693536)
They are two different technologies that solve the problem in different ways - One is not necessarily better than the other.

I like resistive-type touch screens because it allows you to use a stylus thus giving you more accuracy - ideal for paint-type packages, photo-retouching.

Capacitive-type touch screens are more receptive and the added benefit of using a solid cover - e.g. glass.

If the n900 was a capacitive-type screen there is the possibility of shattering the screen and still scratching it.

Yes agree with that. Comes down to what you use it for. I don't use anything that needs a stylus so would very much have preferred a capacitive screen for better precision and avoiding the scratching issue. The only time I use my stylus is when I have to because of lower touch responsiveness on resistive screens such as when I am playing free cell. Would prefer to use my fingers but keep making errors.

UNderworld 2010-06-01 12:22

Re: Reason I sold my N900
 
reason why i will sell my N900:

ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.
ITS SH*T.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8