Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Thanks for this app, I've ported it to Harmattan (early, unfinished port, but thanks to the clear organization of your code it was quite easy to reuse the core): https://github.com/harmattan/classicprintqml/

fieldofcows, is it okay with you that I call it "Classic Print" in the UI (and "classicprintqml" as the package name), or should I rename the port? Also, the garage page says license is "GNU GPL" - can you clarify which version of the license (e.g. GPL 2 only or GPL2+ or GPL3+)?

I might also have some questions about the inner workings of the code later on when I actually add UI controls for the different filters...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

This is just fantalastic news @thp, the news on this app I've been waiting on :D
Are you gonna port Classic Cam too?

Regards Dousan...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Probably not - it's probably easier to add the capture feature to the Classic Print app once it's more mature.

Right now, the port is very barebones, and just displays all files in your DCIM folder, and when you click on it, it applies the default effect of Classic Print and shows it to you.

See https://github.com/harmattan/classic...ob/master/TODO for a list of things that still need to be done. Feel free to "git clone" the code and contribute! :)

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Sounds great either way and if it's 'only' turning out to the classic print you'll work on that's cool as it is the most impotant of the two. I'm just happy to see this being ported :D

Sorry, can't contribute with any coding, know nothing about development, I'm just a simple end user. The only thing I can do is help out with testing if needed :)

Regards Dousan...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

As a user of the N900 version of the application, you could maybe create a list of "most important" features so I can prioritize which features to port first. Also, with the UX guidelines as reference, you could draft how the UI should look and work like :) Keep it simple and easy, the N900 UI while powerful seems to be a bit too highly-configurable for my taste.

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Ahh I see... Would very much like to help out that way. I'll have a look at it this weekend. Thanks.

Regards Dousan...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

I had some more time to work on it tonight, and hooked up all the controls to the QML UI.

Here's a demo video: http://youtu.be/LKvowH_daok
Code here: https://github.com/harmattan/classicprintqml

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Looks really good @thp :)

Are you gonna implement all features in the port?

I had a look at the original app yeaterday and thought all of the filters are important, though could be arranged different. They wasn't as intuitive as could be in the original app.

Had a look at the link for the N9 UI you posted, got some ideas, still in my head, but you got it looking pretty good.

Do you want any feedback/ideas on the UI and if you're not implementing all features do you then want feedback on wich would be preferable?

Regards Dousan...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Just bumping this thread.

@thp have you stopped developping on this port?

Would be a shame if you have dropped it...

Regards Dousan...

Re: [Announce] Classic Print - Retro style photo editor
 

Yes, I haven't done any work on this in the last 3 months. Later today is Hack-A-N9, and while I initially planned on working on NumptyPhysics a bit again, I might also have a look into pushing this one a bit forward.

What's the current status? I think it "basically works", but we might need to package it? Has somebody already done a nice 80x80 icon for it? Can you organize such an icon in the next few hours, so that I can integrate it when I work on it later?

As with most of these hacks, don't expect me to maintain them forever. Ideally I'd just do the first step in showing that it's possible, and providing some ground structure for someone else to pick up the work.

(Just a bit offtopic, because I've reading lots of your posts in other threads recently: Can you put the "Regards Dousan..." into the signature and not append it to every post? I always "read into" this signature, and then think "oh no, now I've read it again!")