maemo.org - Talk
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Competitors (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   N9 Specs Leaked (maybe) (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=60925)

alienhead 2010-08-23 19:39
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
I don't understand whats the harm in having a faster CPU?
And why should you have to overclock, if you think 1ghz its fast enough?

GeraldKo 2010-08-23 20:08
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NvyUs (Post 796122)
tissot can you post link to them specs please i believe they are the real ones i think,
this, from Engadget, what you want?

NvyUs 2010-08-23 20:09
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alienhead (Post 796206)
I don't understand whats the harm in having a faster CPU?
And why should you have to overclock, if you think 1ghz its fast enough?
just b/c we can whats the point in having powerful device if we cant tinker it for fun.

efekt 2010-08-23 20:11
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Higher CPU = less battery time. Thats for starts.
Secondly, a mobile OS should be an OS which is developed to use as minimal resources as possible, so it'd not interfere with the applications running on it, and leave most of the resources for those applications for use.
If your OS is a resource hog, the solution is NOT to build a better platform with more resources hardware-wise, but to build your OS to be slim and smart to begin with.
Stronger hardware is not a solution for a bad code - fixing the code should be the solution.

tissot 2010-08-23 20:13
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alienhead (Post 796150)
yeah i agree 1ghz would be enough for sluggish performance.
Well it's supposed to be TI's OMAP36xx and it's 45nm(should also use less power even with the higher clock speed) based. It would be in the same league with A4, hummingbird and all those are well above snapdragon 1ghz.

Interesting to see when that OMAP36xx ships with Droid 2 that how the overcloking goes. TI's stuff have been great at it compared to Qualcomms stuff.

alienhead 2010-08-23 20:14
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
What if you have to go beyond, the normal apps?
One thing i feel is, dual core is the future. So before anyone does, Nokia should do it.

msa 2010-08-23 20:17
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bundyo (Post 795994)
I really hope it doesn't have AMOLED... I'm rather not impressed with them.
how can anyone with working eyesight say that? ^^

Quote:
Originally Posted by efekt (Post 796243)
Higher CPU = less battery time. Thats for starts.
is that so?
so how come that galaxy s, wave or other 1ghz devices run 10 times longer than the n900?

hint: its not only about the raw number.

Milhouse 2010-08-23 20:53
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by msa (Post 796252)
how can anyone with working eyesight say that? ^^
Not only that, but having the ability to always show a screensaver (eg. date/time, missed calls/messages etc. etc.) on AMOLED screens is a revelation after so many years of blank screens whenever the device is idle.

imperiallight 2010-08-23 21:36
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tissot (Post 796136)
Unfortunately the original posts in howardforums have been removed after the spec list got even quoted in Engadget and the guy who leaked them wanted to keep them in a smaller circle.
There's still parts found in http://forum2.mobile-review.com/index.php and i quoted all of them plus some i did read from howardforums.
Engadget comments circa June

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/09/n...ents/28516245/

Tbh, the specs seem outlandish but nothing so far is going against them given the photo leaks.

Helmuth 2010-08-23 21:40
Re: N9 Specs Leaked (maybe)
 
In my opinion AMOLED screens are only imposter for a store. Never seen a single one that satisfied me in bright sunlight. Perhaps we could see well-engineered AMOLED in a few years. But I don't see this at the next device generation. The step would be to big.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:30.
Page 4 of 6 « First 23 4 56
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8