![]() |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/...ew-hits-a-snag :D |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
I'd say the availability of NDK for WP has the same interest for FOSS like ability to have ports for desktop Windows (like that of Firefox, LibreOffice etc.). I.e. it helps people to switch away from proprietary platforms, while still maintaining some familiar software stack :)
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Alright. I will make Nokia/MS an offer. Give me a device where I can develop and run PyQt applications and I will buy it. Otherwise, forget it.
There! |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Since WP7 is nothing but a runtime environment for Sliverlight and XNA applets, Qt on WP7 is even technically totally out of scope.
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
|
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
But what I posted above does make sense= ARM-based tablets utilizing the Qt-framework within Windows8. |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
Quote:
a) Elop announces that the deal with Microsoft is a resounding success and will build on it to make even more WP phones or b) Elop announces Nokia is making too much money on WP phones so now it will spend it on making a "FOSS disruption" phone. |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
Quote:
Nokia's bad decision of the decade was NOT executing a full scale international patent war assault on the Cupertino Crew upon the release of the original iPhone in 2007. Patent war Armageddon should have come and gone taking with it Stevie Job's beloved iPhone and allowing for the release of the scientists that he still probably has locked in his basement. |
Re: Qt headed to WP ?
You prefer Nokia to become another patent troll? I wouldn't buy a thing from them in that case. Doing it in defense isn't the same though.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8