![]() |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Some of the good news:
- The lipstick crash has been fixed in some recent Jolla update. - When the Jolla keyboard TOH appears, it should work with Xwayland. The bad news: - Still no touch input. Possibly will make Xwayland use the 'propietary' lipstick protocols (aka the hackish solution). |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
|
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
|
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
|
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
But I would suspect that "the right thing", then, would be to look at whether or not the custom touch protocol can be ripped out in favor of wl_touch, and XWayland made to understand wl_touch? |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Interesting, I hope this sees some major progress over the next 6mth or so.
Some of you guys are Gods amongst men, really... |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
What about hacking on libinput ? and expect it to be part of sfos ?
|
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
It's also at the wrong layer: the compositor is responsible for talking to the hardware (using evdev directly in the current case, using libinput as you're proposing) and propagating those events to clients. |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Quote:
(Note: no rotation yet, and for some reason the Xwayland window does not appear in the TOHKBD2 task switcher) |
Re: XWayland doable from user side or jolla required?
Seems Ubuntu Phone will be able to run X Apps with "Convergence" :
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2015/09/u...ng-mir-video-2 X Apps Running on Mir Display Server in a Unity 8 session |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:25. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8