![]() |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
At least it has 2 GB of RAM.
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
I've been using the Fairphone 2 for quite a while now, and the small software related issues that I have (PPI not detected properly, very occasional ~2 weekly keyboard crash that causes a reboot) are far less annoying than the serious hardware issues that I had with Jolla 1 (earpiece speaker broke very quickly due to dodgy contact/bad build quality, something wrong with the SIM holder that repeatedly corrupted my SIM cards in a way that meant my data would stop working suddenly, and then eventually i'd have no service at all until I went into town and replaced the SIM). How do you repair a Jolla 1? You can't even get spare parts for most of it. How do you repair a Fairphone? Hopefully you won't have to because the build quality is better to start with. If you do need to make a repair, you can order the parts from the manufacturer and do it yourself instead of sending it off to Finland... |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
I don't particularly see the point of this. At least not the transparent 'developer programme' / 'community device' stuff. Also seems like a poor value prospect when you'll be able to import the identical Intex device for significantly less (and with a proper warranty - albeit at distance - presumably).
Only way it makes sense is to gauge interest ahead of a possible larger run. It does serve one useful purpose for the remnants of the community, though. We now know that Intex availability is aimed at July ... but as this is Jolla, that probably means December. Frankly, I'm amazed Intex have stuck with them. The only thing I'm really concerned with is that now we know C / Intex have a quad core, if they'll fix Sailfish to actually be able to use 2 cores or more properly. If not, they might as well have specified a dual core, as the extra 2 cores would be useless for all tasks except Alien Dalvik based ones. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
And how so to become a member of community you need just to pay the fee. What does it remind you btw? And how do I become member of community if i buy this device and not other Jolla device? Isn't anyone buying any Jolla device, even not Jolla's but device with ported SFOS part of the community. Don't you think actually that those who bought android devices to port and support Jolla. Those who donated refund to them. Those who active in community and create a lot of apps. Maybe those people deserve to get free one's from them. But if they just sell phone for full price with no warranty and as they out they check if they can sell more(reminds me second waves of tablets btw). I do not think is anything about community, but mostly about money chi-ching. |
Re: Jolla C
Any news/inside for second batch? Really want this device but missed the order... :(
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
If you do, take into consideration proper VAT (for different countries) + postage. How would you 'import' from Snapdeal - via agent or take a trip to India? Consider those, too. What comes to warranty and distance: limitations exist e.g. you cannot ship mobile phones from UK to India, you cannot ship devices with batteries via post office from Finland to India (only via courier i.e. UPS/DHL, read: costly) etc... I'm sure other limitations exist. Of course, you can take (another) trip to India which is a bit pricey for that -as you put it- 'proper warranty' and IMO practically nullifies it altogether in usefulness. Not saying you're wrong, I'd just like to see what 'significantly less' actually comes down to, proper warranty or not. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
However, sending things around - regardless of sparsely policed import regs - is rather less complicated than you make it sound. Also, I don't think the battery part is significant. Since if the device is faulty as opposed to the battery, you need not return the battery. Still, the seeming likelihood of them wanting to try to get away with a very limited warranty should be rather alarming. Especially given that this is Jolla (major issues in the past), and that Intex generally tend to offer EXTREMELY cheap devices from low grade OEMs, which probably have a higher than average failure rate. Also, I don't think a limited warranty is likely to be compatible with EU law. There is no way to not define this as a consumer product, given that despite the titular developer programme, it is absolutely nothing of the sort and makes no attempt to be. There's no selection or application process ... it's just first come, first served for ANYONE. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Given the above, I don't think Paypal only is any kind of surprise. |
Re: Jolla C
Before anyone blame me for tags. It wasn't me.
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
So I'd say getting the Intex phone to your hands costs more than you make it sound. And regarding warranty you know for certain the battery is not at fault, how? But let's say it's not and it can be left out. The phone still cannot be sent to India at least by UK Royal Mail http://www.royalmail.com/india (under Prohibitions). Sure, it may not be complicated to send it otherwise - but it will cost you more. Your 'significantly less' does not yet sound very convincing. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Most issues are not battery related. Many obviously not so. Transporting Lithium-Ion batteries by air should not be an issue if they are detached from the device. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
does it really matter? It's not that there is something to buy anyway. And it is so for a very loooooooong time. I still want black TOH...... for 29€.
The same goes for harbor, they would like to attract developers with jolla C (and they sold them to anyone so that some who maybe is interested in development now can't get one) but at the same time those developers have no way to sell their apps in the store since store does not support payment. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXaxLQ0W8AAhaLh.jpg |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
The program should possibly include some option for Jolla to refund/award developers/others that contribute during program so atleast the device will be free. Since they have the tablet scam refund those dev refunds should be easy now. Another option could be that second part of the tablet refund could(if decided by user) sent to an account and go back to developers in the program) |
Re: Jolla C
Luckily I paid one.
Anybody know whether Intex sell the Aqua battery? so I can use in my Jolla C. |
Re: Jolla C
How I see this program:
https://media.giphy.com/media/3oEdv5...WBWM/giphy.gif How fanboys see this program: http://i.imgur.com/eb3SvXO.gif What is this program in reality: http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/283...ng-a-cow-o.gif |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Anyway they only said it was replaceable, not that you could buy a spare :D. Maybe by the time Intex release their version it will be so out of date, it will probably be cheaper than a spare battery. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
And before you crazy. I don't say this program is Useless. Jolla had to do something and it's better than nothin. Peace out. |
Re: Jolla C
Peace to you too scamboy :P
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
When I saw it, I thought for a while: "Maybe finally something with hwkb". Jolla is really wasting the niche.
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
They already are a niche product. Becoming an even more niche product would not be advisable if they wanted to turn a profit and/or continue to make strides in their visibility. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Now? They need to put something in the hands of folks that's a bit more up-to-date - specs is an argument I'll not venture into since honestly it's not the older phone and thus "new". Where we disagree; I think this stalls a lot of the naysayers once these devices have been delivered and the company can be seen as moving forward past this tablet non-delivery. This is a necessary and visible move, but it's less about the hardware than it is about maintaining their position and intent to become an alternative solution than iOS and Android. While I'd love to have seen a device that incorporates Kinect-like touch-less gestures - I hate touching my phone and leaving fingerprints when I need quick information and it's on my desk. Or I'd love to have seen a device that sorta breaks the mold like the vaporware Ubuntu Edge looked to do with some killer specs and industrial design - again, we knew that it was not going to make it at that campaign price. But at the end of the day, I see this as a way to stay relevant. Seems to be working; this thread as evidence. Now let's hope the people with the devices endeavor to make something memorable as opposed to folks that just argue ad nauseum just to be right about something. I've no time or temperament to deal with that level of folly. I'd just rather deal with stuff that makes sense and has an impact. |
Re: Jolla C
I agree with everything you said. The kind of visibility I meant (same as the kind I thought you meant to start with) is the visibility by Jimmy Public. You know, the guy sitting next to you at work and feverishly tapping in Wazzap on his Samsung. The guy who would normally never have looked in Jolla's direction. The kind of visibility you are talking about is fine but it applies only to those who are already watching. Kinda like preaching to the converted.
By the way, the kind if customers who like Jolla for the OS (as opposed to, say despite the OS) also happen to be the kind who like a hardware keyboard. If not a complete match, there is at least a large overlap. |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla C
buy a surface
put your fav linux + gnome3 on it ??? profit |
Re: Jolla C
Can you buy a surface without giving money to Microsoft?
Can you fit a surface in the pocket? |
Re: Jolla C
Quote:
Gotta be. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:15. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8