![]() |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Magnesium alloys have a hexagonal lattice structure.
It’s very strong and very fast. Magnesium is approximately 75% lighterthan steel. Will we also see a heavy steel version later on? That would be one unique device :D |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
|
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
Leaving your house key under the plant pot next to the door is also convenient. |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
Don't tell me, you are putting your fingers away occasionally :D (well maybe out of control, but that's still different). |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
|
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
The picture just helps remember the right position for the number. I don't know, if also moving the picture around would increase security. Quote:
More often I find the screen waking up but not responding to my fingers. Only way is to press power button to turn it (the screen) off an on again. That being said, I still use it. |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
One time they are tight (lots of lines and columns), and one time they are loose (less lines and columns with more space between them). Of course it is still possible to do some social-engineering of sorts and guess the right number and position (for instance, you are more likely to unlock with the same hand, and thus you probably won't position your hand/thumb *above* the spot you're aiming at, which allows onlookers to remove an specific area for their analysis), but it will take quite a number of unlocks. Now compare that with regular number- or shape-passwords: they only require one (1) good look to get compromised... |
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Are you Ready? Fx HW Keyboard Phone
Quote:
The lock codes are far from secure when used in public, people can guess pretty fast what is your code by sneaking over your shoulder in the subway, by roughly seeing the moves of your fingers even in front of you, using the reflection of the windows in the bus, or just follow the smudge on your screen if you are using a geometric pattern. To be fair, they probably don't care at all about the code and the data anyway, they just want the phone to sell it, but I still feel better if I know access to my data is not particularly easy. Now, if someone threatens me and kindly asks me to unlock the phone for him/her with a knife on my belly, I'll happily unlock it with my fingerprint and even give away the code to unlock without fingerprints. Hopefully he/she will leave me with all my fingers. But if I lose my phone or just find a pickpocket, I don't think they would come back and track me down to get my thumbs, and I'll be glad that there is no smudge to follow on the screen or any code to spy before stealing the phone. Quote:
By the way Juiceme, which procedure did you use to enable double-tap-to-unlock on Sailfish X? I haven't read the corresponding thread on TJC in a long time but I thought enabling it still had some downsides. I am using an Xperia X Compact, I think some sensors are not enabled, maybe that would be an extra issue. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:26. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8