![]() |
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
Quote:
So, nice you're paying with these settings. If you want to share your improvements with us you're very welcome. I also invite you to try the 0.9.7 version, it's very impressive. Hopefully you won't get a "device malfunctioning" when installing or uninstalling (I couldn't solve this occasional problem yet). |
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
UI is still a little slow, much faster than stock version though. It lags sometimes, but not too often. One thing that bugs me is that folders now take a little bit longer to open than normal.
To summarise, UI is slower than 9.4. Not by much though. And folders take about a second to open rather than instantly. |
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
Quote:
|
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
So far so good on my side, can't complain yet, thanx traysh
|
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
trying to install 0.9.7 gives me the same installation failed error as before.
I am again trying to rescue the installation back to 0.9.3, which was the last version that worked properly then I'm going to uninstall it completely, and attempt a clean install of .0.9.7 EDIT: Yup, there ya go, finally. Uninstalling 0.9.3 finally let me install .0.9.7 cleanly on top. It seems to be fine now. It feels a tad slower, but i've just started playing with it, I'm sure it will smooth out. Will give feedback later when i've had more time with it. |
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
Thanks traysh :) so far no problems at all :) keep up the good work :)
|
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
Ok opening folders only happens the first time. And the lag is gone. Its awesome!
|
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
the fastern9 does not strikes the firewall pro its just an coincidence the firewallpro does not work corect to all country mine never works never block call only sms
|
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
I installed the latest version (0.9.7), and the performance improvements are HUGE. Wow. I had been on (0.9.6) earlier, which worked fine for me with no problems, but 0.9.7 takes the party to a whole new level of speed and fluency.
I also overclock, by way of disclosure, to 1375 MHz and 1,375,000 mV, so my device is faaaaasssssttttt. Perfectly stable for weeks now, so the overclocking has been the same on my device for 0.9.6 and 0.9.7, and version 0.9.7 is still noticeably faster. |
Re: [Testing needed] FasterN9
no, firewall+pro didnt work when fasterN9 installed, :confuse:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8