![]() |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
I browse TMO daily with Opera tablet on N9 and I prefer N9 over desktop. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Now I have to find a way to import my contacts. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Just as we started to mobe beyond the Web 1.0 640x480 website resolution standard on our 24" screens they needed Mobile web sites (for iPhone). Only exception of a mobile website I do use is Zoho.com -> their mobile web site is really good so I could do without whining for a mobile email client on N900. (but the availability of their mobile website gave Zoho the excuse to make their desktop website more bloated to the point browsing full XLS files like before on the N900 became too much a pain) So far on Sailfish the Firefox browser on virtual Android is the only cure against the plague of mobile web sites. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
And about 'desktop based websites works nice on a mobile phone' mm yeah right? Maybe for a teenage geeks who thinks (ohh look my phone is soo cool I can show whatever site on my phone blablabla) even if its not readable for people over 20 years old... But definitivly not good for anyones eyes. You know your eyes getting less good for every year... and the more looking at those mobiles phones this days I am sure our eyes getting even worse faster with all this hiresolution hype going on.. So stop blame me for whining when I tell facts! |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
There's a difference between wanting mobile sites and appreciating a (full) webpage that has been developed with the mobile user experience in mind. Just saying.
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
All I expect as an "early investor" is a public, properly cared for, bug tracker.
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Also a really good way to learn finnish words describing despair, destruction and dissapointment. :rolleyes: |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Get rid of the left area its just to much info shown in you have to click alot to zoom and so on. Also try click all those small buttons on TMO like "thanks" or "next" and so on. Now that could be better. This is NOT to rant at the webadmins and a definitivly not better webdesigner(probadly worse) but continue bury our heads in the sand is just plain wrong. Fact is facts. TMO has never been good for any mobile except maybe N900 with resistive screen and a pen. Btw. I just wonder how many who actually has tried to POST a message in Jolla phone and edit the trext moving the cursor? It was bad on N9 but even worse now. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
I use FF on droid and yet don't have any problems viewing, posting or even moderating the site. I double-click on an area and it zooms in well there unlike what I suspect you are suffering on Jolla's browser which may be similar to the oddities exhibited in qmlmozembed. Of course everything can be improved upon but its nowhere as bad as you make it out to be just because you have sub-standard tools :D |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Sending bugs down some e-mail blackholes just isn't this person's cup of tea anymore. There's so much inefficiency there, it mostly makes sense to do something else with my life. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
After I managed to finally install Google Play and many apps from there my frustration regarding Jolla eased a bit... :)
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Skype is owned by Microsoft. I can only say that ... ;/ |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Documents, Music, Photos and I cannot recall what else will be indexed. you can make any subolders under Music/ and put your songs there and it should get indexed. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
The indexed directories are listed in /home/nemo/.config/user-dirs.dirs
Maybe you can even change them. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
There is no visibility of what bugs are already known - or if a solution/workaround is available for a bug - when you use email so the same bugs will be reported over and over and over until they are fixed (if they are ever fixed). Do you really think an email blackhole such as this is a better use of Jolla resources than a public Bugzilla, or a better way of engaging with end users about the problems they are facing with the platform? If so, why doesn't every project use email to report bugs rather than waste time maintaining a bug tracker? The thing is, the more excuses I hear about Jolla NOT implementing a public Bugzilla, the more I am reminded of the Nokia of old and how they claimed they could only ever manage an internal bug tracker for Harmattan (although they still - no doubt grudgingly - put up a public tracker, but rarely gave it much attention). It might be too early to say this, but some old habits do seem to die hard and sadly this is one of them. A public bug tracker is a hugely positive way in which to engage with users (customers) and address their problems, concerns and ideas. For a company that claims to be open, it should be a high priority but if it's not even on their to-do list then nothing has really changed, the closed mentality is the same as it ever was, only the name above the door is now different. I'm here to support Jolla, but it seems they're farking it up already and in a very Nokian-way. The software - as it stands - simply isn't that great (but it's beta, so lets cut it some slack), the hardware is over priced budget specification (but we paid the high price to support the "dream", not to buy top-notch hardware, right?), and their attempts at engaging with their users amounts to nothing more than Twitter and a developers mailing list. It's really pretty sub-standard all around. It's early days, and maybe Jolla can improve their communication in 2014, but if not I don't fancy their chances. I've sent several bugs through to developer-care@jolla.com and not had a single reply, so if nothing else an unmonitored Bugzilla would at least mean other users can quickly see that a bug is being experienced by others, and learn if there is a solution/workaround, or add their experiences. Sending emails to a blackhole helps nobody. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Besides, when any given web page is fully zoomed out the links tend to be very close together. For a person with ordinary-sized fingers, like me, it's easy to select the wrong link or button by accident. Also, it sometimes takes several tries to activate a textarea, I don't know why; is it because the touch must be long enough, short enough, just the right length, just the right area (pressure), or do I move my finger too much? |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
So - anyone figured out how to synchronise music from Windows 7 media player to the Jolla? More specifically, how to synchronise to the SD card (synchronising to internal memory works fine, but there's only about 11Gb of free space there, and I've got 10Gb of music ...)
Not quite sure what the point of an invisible SD card is. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
OMG! i had to use the official WA-client for the first time on Jolla today:
it is so ugly and bad to use and full of lacking features, i really feel bad for the people, who had to use THIS all the time... we really need some money and a Jolla for Cepi, i was using Whatsup all the time and i love(d) it! |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Edit: Never mind, have now enabled developer mode and can see the SD card mounted at /run/user/100000/media/sdcard: Code:
[nemo@jolla .ssh]$ df |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
While I understand how a public bugtracker would serve at least the more active part of the community, I can also see how there's likely to be a frantic bugfix frenzy going on, and a feeling of being overwhelmed by bug reports. Of course having these organized would help, but perhaps they don't think they can tie up anybody for the task? As a customer I do hope that they have clear priorities for the upcoming updates, and I also wish to get clear communication. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
a
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
That's part of what I mean by invisible.
I know that the Jolla can see the SD card because that's how I copied my N9 contacts over properly (stuck SD card into PC, copied exported VCFs onto SD card, put SD card into Jolla, and then was able to import all contacts from those VCFs - Settings/Apps/People/Import contacts/From File. And I can see it in terminal (or SCP or similar) as /run/user/100000/media/sdcard |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
and people wonder why TMO is not a place for non geeks.... |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
I've followed the tutorial to get Play Store working on Sailfish, transfered "system" folder", got root privileges (checked afterwards with whoami), ran the rsync command without any issue, rebooted, installed the .apk files, and yet Play Stores crashes the second I launch it. Anything I did wrong? I ran rsync from Fingerterm on the Jolla itself.
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
I have pretty much given up editing text and posting on forums / blogs on my N9 prior to that 'discovery', especially on pages with limited text entry fields where scrolling to select/change a word would become so frustrating that I couldn't even bother. If Sailfish doesn't have such keypage on their keyboard - they need to add it ASAP (or we need Swype for Sailfish). No matter how precise your digitizer is, sometimes you just cannot beat good ol' key select. |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
The 64GB micro SDXC cards work fine in the Jolla when formatted as standard FAT (i.e. FAT32). The belief that FAT32 is not able to handle such large partitions comes from the fact that the Windows disk format utilities cannot format such large partitions. However, using the Disk utility in Ubuntu, and formatting as 'FAT' there works fine, and reads correctly on Windows, Jolla, and Ubuntu (and presumably other distros). (Notice the FAT32 maximum volume size and the note in wikipedia.) |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Well, who will use exFAT, if they could format their cards with FAT32...? :)
|
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1054 http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=1727 |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Granted that I needed to install things like python and less when they were preinstalled on N9, but they are just a "zypper in" away, and on the other hand to get things like rsync or luks you had to install additional community repos. (which were not there in the beginnig, BTW...) |
Re: Jolla User Experience Thread
Quote:
Same thing happens on other sites where you need to type long POC on a textbox... However it's good to know that one is also coming (like the landscape mode on browser wich will help a lot... used exclusively landscape on N9) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:51. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8