![]() |
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
- Portrait mode accross the UI. ((A MUST))
|
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
I'm calling shenanigans on the "universal portrait mode" requests--much like the endless yammering about "capacitive", it's a hollow criterion for merit based on iWannabe rather than an actual need. Sure it's useful for one-handed txting, and a handful of apps, but it's hardly a universal necessity. A lot of the Maemo 5 apps are best used with keyboard opened, anyway. |
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
|
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
|
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
Just forget about KDE and look at Qt with new eyes and without prejudice. Nokia did (IMHO) a good thing liberating Qt a bit from the K grip by buying Trolltech. It's a fresh start and who cares if KDE is using Qt? :) OTOH, Qt is stable and has been used by commercial software (Opera, Google Earth, Skype, etc) for years. |
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
probably: bug fixes, bug fixes, bug fixes and uhmm oh yeah! bug fixes.
We wont get any extra's! only when we yet again buy a new phone |
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
I doubt we will get even one of those. |
Re: Speculation about the next firmware (PR1.2?) and its release date
Quote:
|
Re: Does anyone know when the next firmware (PR1.2?) is expected?
Quote:
for example...lets take the iphone, although I think the N900 is a better device and highly more configurable. Has anyone ever noticed that when you ask the iphone to do something there is no response back to the user unless the action failed which make the UE (User Exprience) in the GUI so much nicer and slick, not to mention faster. Where nokia falls down on the GUI side of things is that their interfaces sometime provide too much feedback. For instance why do i need a message from the hildon desktop saying "bluetooth activated" when i have just selected to turn the thing on. wouldn't it be obvious that it is activated if i just asked the system to turn it on. In the event of the system returning any sort of message back to the user, it should be an error message ...i.e "bluetooth activation unsuccessful" or something like that. My point being many more notification messages generated by the UI should only be there to display error messages to inform the user that the required action had failed. If no message was displayed when the user asked the system to do something then take it for granted that the task was executed successfully. If many users disagree with this suggestion then as an alternative maybe have a confirmation one can switch on and off i.e "supress system notification messages" Cheers Thoughts and comments on a postcard please |
Re: Does anyone know when the next firmware (PR1.2?) is expected?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8