![]() |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
I can make the N900 charge meter display 100% for 2 days :)
|
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
No, that's not "free" either, but there's no way to complain about such costs without sounding incredibly lame. |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Test 3)
Same characteristics but without IM enabled, I list them again - Wifi disabled, 3G enabled, no IM accounts enabled, kernel ideal loaded, 2 desktops, widget of calendar, three contacts in desktop, two widgets-like indicating the internet IP and the battery percentage, brightness to the 1 position, display almost all the time disconnected. Mail autocheck each 30 min. - A not so-constant slope seen in BatteryGraph app, like repetitive cycles of higher slope I guess coinciding with navigation Well, last time with 3G and IM enabled (brightness 3), I had a battery decrease of a 42% in 2h 46min -> -0.253% / min Now, this are the results, -66 % in 4h 15min -> 0.259% / min (detailed) - 7:55 90% casual navigation (< 5 min) 3 SMS sent - 8:13 83% nothing - 9:02 74% mail erase some messages sms received - 10:13 68% mail erase some messages navigation 5 min - 11:03 48% mail erase some messages navigation 5 min - 12:10 24% So, conclusions, having the two IM accounts enabled has not implied a significant difference, has it? Or if not, perhaps I have had this time a little more activity, but since both IM were disabled I have kept the same battery decrease. In any case, the differences are minimum, in my opinion the price you pay to be connected is not huge, but rather acceptable. What I think is not acceptable, is that with such a minimum activity, the n900 is so empty of energy. This time we have moved from subjectivity to objectivity, then I have two questions: a) Is this a normal behaviour of the n900? b) Is this a reasonable behaviour of the n900, taking into account what the other devices offer? Just to decide which position the n900 deserves in an hypothetical top chart. As a subjective note, I had the same battery-sensations with the n900 normal-clocked and without extra-devel enabled, two options that however I find absolutely necessary to have a decent n900 experience. EDIT: No catorise or similar installed, since I read time ago that it had a bug that could induce a high and constant CPU usage |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
|
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
Quote:
maemo-list-user-packages Quote:
Quote:
http://maemo.org/packages/view/powertop/ Code:
Add devel-testing to app manager |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
i installed powetop about two weeks ago but have not figured out how to use it. any suggestions?
|
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
Itīs shell application. Itīs pretty geeky and i do not understand it+s ouput fully, but i do understand/see when something is not right. Hard to explain :) http://maemo.org/packages/view/powertop/ http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/powertop/powertop.php http://www.linuxpowertop.org/powertop.php Use google and power search to learn more. And run it with different usage scenarios on your N900. |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
|
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Wiki seems to have some explanation about powertop output (see the Analysis tools section):
http://wiki.maemo.org/N900_Software_Power_management |
Re: Its not Wifi, but GPRS that is consuming most of the battery
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:52. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8