![]() |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=300 |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
Is it "Referendum voting will be open for the same length of time as the council elections" which has made people think that it needs to run concurrently; or is it just the current Council's desire to deal with both simultaneously so that the new Council can hit the ground running? |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
All things considered I think it is good you've started the debate on this, since now it makes things much clearer. |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
For election to succeed you have to determine the census first. |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
The interest of N9/N950 group are not the same as for maemo devices. In fact based on the events here, it seems they are very conflicting. |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
|
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
But since there's precedent and nobody complained we can assume the latter interpretation, so there's no real need to rush the reorg referendum right now. |
Re: [Council] Maemo Elections - September 2011
Quote:
But what about the fact I still regularly use an N810 (and there's another in the house that, until recently, was being used daily); and - sure - I'm now down to "only" one N900. Pfft. What would you do with such a census? Declare the results of the election invalid if too many "undesirables" voted for the option you didn't want? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8