maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Nemo Mobile (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   Nemo mobile discussions (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=80361)

ivgalvez 2012-01-11 09:52

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Have anyone seen this announcement from Intel?

With complete open source drivers for Intel SoC it should be easier to port Nemo Mobile to this kind of phones. I don't really need Nemo on my N900 but in any other device for the time my beloved device dies.

shmerl 2012-01-11 16:26

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Sounds good (if drivers and specs will really be open). The more devices - the merrier.

Estel 2012-01-11 17:03

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Intel
Intel claimed that its single core, two-thread 1.6 GHz "Medfield" Atom processors offered better performance and lower power consumption than unspecified ARM processors in unspecified popular Android phones.

:rolleyes: how cute. I think they need to learn *much* about meritocratic approach, even when it comes to announcing they own projects. BTW, my Sharp calculator got better performance than unspecified Intel CPU bundled in unspecified motherboard, released on unspecified year of unspecified millennium.

/Estel

m4r0v3r 2012-01-12 12:47

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Estel (Post 1148936)
:rolleyes: how cute. I think they need to learn *much* about meritocratic approach, even when it comes to announcing they own projects. BTW, my Sharp calculator got better performance than unspecified Intel CPU bundled in unspecified motherboard, released on unspecified year of unspecified millennium.

/Estel

would be great if it was true, i'd buy it over an N9 any day, as long as drivers and bootloader were open.

m4r0v3r 2012-01-12 12:54

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
after some digging up

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5365/i...or-smartphones

i guess the power consumption isnt too bad especially compared to the nexus and GS II but it kind of shows, that for the high stress processor tasks it uses a lot of power, like 720p playback or anything really thats going to put the processor at 100% maybe cause the gpu isn't involved?

jalyst 2012-01-12 13:06

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by m4r0v3r (Post 1149462)

Yeah linked to that here...
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...34#post1149034
For the love of God Nokia why!? .... Why!?! :(

Quote:

i guess the power consumption isnt too bad especially compared to the nexus and GS II but it kind of shows, that for the high stress processor tasks it uses a lot of power, like 720p playback or anything really thats going to put the processor at 100% maybe cause the gpu isn't involved?
That's at least partly explained in the article IIRC

m4r0v3r 2012-01-12 13:44

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
if they stuck with mother****ing Meego life would of been some much better, I mean imagine that processor running Meego in that slim sexy body, with 720p main profile running perfectly and am pretty damn sure that processor is fast enough for anything they need. then you'd have us just randomly installing any linux flavour easily and any linux apps if intel keep things open.

but i guess thats in a perfect world

ayazpak 2012-01-12 22:16

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Another latest image arrived http://repository.maemo.org/meego/Ne...-n900-testing/

ayazpak 2012-01-19 19:30

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Today Nemo relased new testing image with some bug fixes http://repository.maemo.org/meego/Ne...-n900-testing/

Flynx 2012-01-19 20:09

Re: Nemo mobile discussions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ayazpak (Post 1152945)
Today Nemo relased new testing image with some bug fixes http://repository.maemo.org/meego/Ne...-n900-testing/

tried flashing to internal memory using the same method as meego, but it didn't boot. should i do something differently for nemo? the installation instructions were only for sdcard.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:22.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8