![]() |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
That way all apps in Extra-testing would be OPTIFIED. If necessary, demote all existing apps from Extras-testing back to Extras-devel and only let the OPTIFIED ones be re-promoted. That way, the only repository that may contain a non optified app is Extras-devel. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
Many of the things in the QA list could be automated, but it's easier to get people to test than to get them to write a testing app and test it. I'm sure that such code would be welcome, though. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
being as simple instruction collection as possible. then extras-testing can include all dev -stuff etc and new people to sw testing don't get frightened and run away.. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
The problem is that many of these new users have a very limited experience with Linux (like me) or no previous experience at all. Therefore something as "simple" as checking optification might already discourage potential beta testers, who might be more than qualified to check the functionality of the application and provide valuable feedback. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
My point is that given being OPTIFIED is virtually a critical requirement of any app, I think whatever needs to be done to AUTOMATE that check during the promotion from Extras-devel to Extras-testing should be done ASAP.
I realise almost any test *could* be automated if enough resources were dedicated to developing an appropriate testing app, but surely given how important being OPTIFIED is, we could at least get that automated ?? I'm surprised this wasn't one of the first things done once the problem was discovered and /OPT was chosen as the solution. Seems crazy to allow more non-optified apps into the Eco system, even if there are warning everywhere about enabling Extras-testing. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
From my experience this is what is considered part of a Build Acceptance Test and comes before any kind of integration is done with the larger code base. Terminology may differ depending on your environment, but the idea is that there are a class of bugs that are so critical that it is a waste of a Tester's time to install them if they fail. Sure we could have 10-50-500 people install an app while being helpful testers and then report the bug, but if we just filled up their memory and bricked the device, I'm sure they all would have preferred that a simple go-nogo test was done before they were put into a compromised situation, and will be Much less likely to help out with Testing in the future.
This has to be a problem already solved, and likely automated by Nokia/Maemo. If I'm just dreaming, will someone who has some info please let me know. If Nokia/Maemo hasn't got the tooling or is able to share with the Community, then we Testers need to understand better what happens between -devel and -testing and how the promotion testing occurs and how it could be improved upon. |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
what happened to the alpha and beta naming and v0.4 etc of apps?
it's universal. everyone generally understands that terminology. My suggestions for making the testing of apps better are: have a dummy hello world type app for noobs and first time testers to help which covers some of the basic functions apps could have. have a guide what to check and they can learn etc. have an application that takes system snapshots. (see my previous post page 5) maybe have it as a bug tracker app, allowing quick feedback to maemo.org allow people to tag an app as testing it so a user can see who and how many people have downloaded it to test and they can message each other about tests they have run etc (already implamented) Make it easier to do things, 1 login rather then 3 for the site. it just gets annoying. people will get lazy and just not bother because they have to make another account. when i get my n900 i'd like to help in testing apps and making it so people who just want a cool phone are able to take part without being a nix hacker, majority of people are from a windows background and haven't really scratched dos or scripting. Theres more user's then developers in the world so making it easy for them to test safely is ideal, gives people who can develop more time to do the more advanced testing and developing |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
I am used to the Gentoo installation system.
One thing that comes in very handy is the "fake root filesystem". Every ebuild installs itself in a fake root, replicating the directory structure there. If everything was okay during the install, this directory just gets (in simple words) copied to the live file system. This could make testing a bit easier cause you can check if everything is optified without affecting the live filesystem. This done, copy those files to the live system and start testing the app. Is there a similar mechanism in apt? Cheers Bjoern |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
Quote:
There was package 13 in Extras, one in Extras-Testing and one in Extras-Devel (package 21). I promoted package 21 to Testing a month ago and that's probably what you got when enabling Testing. Yesterday, though, I promoted it to Extras, but you've got it already installed. So no need to update there. Aniello |
Re: More testers needed to push apps out of extras-testing
i think this should be stickied to make more people aware that they can help with bringing more apps to their n900
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8