maemo.org - Talk - PR 1.3 for N950?

Here's the output when running apt-get dist-upgrade on my N950: http://pastebin.com/2MVTQkSM I'm afraid to install them. Don't want my N950 to end up like a brick or be unflashable.

wook_sf

2012-09-01 17:45

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Quote:

Originally Posted by LouisDK (Post 1259310)

Here's the output when running apt-get dist-upgrade on my N950: http://pastebin.com/2MVTQkSM I'm afraid to install them. Don't want my N950 to end up like a brick or be unflashable.

use one from tpb ;) it's safer :D

topet2k12001

2012-09-01 18:01

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Quote:

Originally Posted by wook_sf (Post 1259314)

use one from tpb ;) it's safer :D

It is, indeed. :)

@LouisDK, take wook_sf's advice. ;)

Milhouse

2012-09-01 18:05

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Quote:

Originally Posted by topet2k12001 (Post 1259321)

It is, indeed. :)

Any downsides, or significant improvements over PR1.2 that make it worthwhile?

topet2k12001

2012-09-01 18:09

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milhouse (Post 1259322)

Any downsides, or significant improvements over PR1.2 that make it worthwhile?

None that I have noticed so far in my experience. In fact my N9 is still on PR1.2 (for specific reasons, as I am writing localized content/documentation/how-to's to cater to the local folks from where I live).

wook_sf

2012-09-01 18:14

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milhouse (Post 1259322)

Any downsides, or significant improvements over PR1.2 that make it worthwhile?

lol, epic, seems to me that pr1.3 is just updated version numbers for each package and that's it :D
hahahaha, really original nokia story...:(

Rusnak-COBRA

2012-09-01 18:19

Re: PR 1.3 for N950?

Wook, it's not so bad as you are saying :)
anyway, is that source from TPB reliable?

wook_sf