![]() |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Quote:
I'm sorry, but I still take the other tack-- I see this as an educational challenge more than anything. I was half-joking with the suggestion of a developer school, but in all seriousness that's close to the solution zone I think we *should* be going toward. The community is transient? Fine-- but instead of working around that, why not drill down a bit deeper and explore why that is-- and effect a REAL solution? And, dammit-- why am I still arguing this? :eek: :p |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
well, for some it will be easier to post it here, because the frequent the forums, it should be easy for some sync-ing of the new and maemo.org
and the ones whoe wouldn't anyways, probably have their own repo, and are adamant about it, so most things wouldnt change their mind anyways but you could always have a itT user account and upload all the things loaded here, to maemo.com under a general itT account, though there are obviously problems with that, the point is, to me at least, is that this here is a good thing |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can understand a developer not wanting to deal with Maemo Garage - there are better project management websites out there. But there is no excuse to avoid Maemo Downloads unless your software is not ready for primetime. |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Thanks for that last post, gnuite, and I can see that my posts should have also made those distinctions.
|
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Why didn't Reggie bother to talk this out with the community and the Maemo devs to come up with the best solution? Instead of getting something useful out of it that helps everybody, we've got this nonsense.
GTFO, KTHXBAI |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Quote:
Actually, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, Navi, but in case you aren't: yours is a completely non-constructive attitude to take. Reggie was just trying to help. Some of the rest of us are just providing some constructive (I hope) criticism - that's how public-domain collaborations improve. |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Quote:
|
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
And of course, there's no reason to delete that specific post and only quote that part of it. There are plenty of other posts you can hunt down, give me infraction points for, and delete too, y'know.
Like I was saying in the post that was deleted, but less "personal attacky" than it already was (which wasn't very much, I might add), Quote:
Unfortunately, a bulk of the positive criticisms are being ignored. What are we to do when we can only go absolutely nowhere? I'll gladly acknowledge the good intentions as soon as we have some real feedback on the feedback. |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
Quim made a very pointed post on maemo-developers that echoes my sentiments almost exactly:
Reggie, in my *personal* opinion you are pointing to the right direction with the wrong munition. |
Re: Announcing the Internet Tablet Talk Software Section
I guess there's nothing more to say. I hope something good comes out of this...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:51. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8