![]() |
Re: Apple iPad 2
The benchmarks are coming, and it looks as though the PVR SGX543MP GPU in the iPad 2 TROUNCES the Tegra 2.
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/...DSC0670_sm.jpg http://www.anandtech.com/show/4216/a...p2-benchmarked http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4216/35901.png http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4216/35902.png http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4216/35903.png This is reason for gloating, and should have the competition quite worried. It seems that Apple made a remarkable decision. The competition, on the other hand played follow the leader, and it cost them a year. I'm impressed. I'm curious how the Adreno 220 and the Mali 400 will stack up to this formidable GPU design. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Wow that's some good gpu performances
|
Re: Apple iPad 2
Something tells me that GPU specs will suddenly matter ;)
But this is most impressive. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Wow, I thought the A5 was only going to match the Tegra2... this thing really blows it out of the water (considering iOS has native apps over honeycomb's VM).
Here's a comparison: http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=10822670 |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
1) Honeycomb most certainly has native apps (games tend to be written in c++). 2) The chart lists the nexus s as being orion, which is wrong -- it's hummingbird. The galaxy S2 is exynos (orion). |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
2) That post is old, I've updated it ... see post 2 of that thread. (I still cannot put a real "maximum theoretical polygon/sec" for the 543mp2, all things point to ~200M t/s, but the benchmark and the press release say otherwise) |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
http://developer.android.com/sdk/ndk/overview.html As an aside, you should really consider doing a bit of research before making assertions. 2) Even your update post seems to include figures lifted from wikipedia (or thin air). Example, imagination states the SGX543MP triangle througput at 35Mpolys/sec not 140M (number of cores not mentioned). http://www.imgtec.com/news/Release/index.asp?NewsID=428 (below the lists) The benchmarks seem to confirm this. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
I hate myself. Just ordered a 16GB iPad2 for the wife. Why do I hate myself? Because I know within 2 minutes of unboxing the thing I'll be all over that mofo mumbling to myself "I hate you Steve Jobs, I hate you". Now, I still hate Uncle Steve and his iJail, but man, his worker ants sure know how to put out quality products.
As a side note, Xoom was a viable contender in my decision, and for a second I gave even Palm/HP a second look. Put in the end, Xoom was out of my price range, and having learned from Maemo5, I didn't want to be "experimenting" with an OS again so the WebOS was out. Ok, who am I kidding, the iPad looks show shiny! |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Hahaha... Apple has the secret sauce to attract the masses.
The specs, the UI, etc, are misdirection. Apple are pros in positioning products -- making people want them. Plus, they tend to be quality products, so they appeal to those driven by rational motives. I hope you enjoy your new toy! I'm sure if you use it for its intended purpose (ie. the apps) it will be much more than a satisfactory experience. Just let us know your thoughts! |
Re: Apple iPad 2
@ysss: wherever he may be
Do you remember when I said that "if the iPad 2 had a retina display, I'd eat my hat?" This was based on the knowledge that desktops/laptops have trouble pushing these resolutions and I assumed accomplishing this with a mobile was unlikely. Well, as it turns out, the display isn't retina-class, but I'm going to eat my hat anyhow, because this years GPU technology (SGX543/Mali400/Adreno220) are all capable of pushing 'retina' resolutions, even if it hasn't been yet been embodied in a device. I'm eating said hat because my very reasons for doubting its inclusion was flat-out wrong. This reinforced a valuable lesson that I had forgotten in that instance. Just because something hasn't been done, doesn't mean that it can't be done. Pass the butter... :( |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:10. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8