![]() |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
We need to backup also firmware FIASCO images (it contains NOLO bootloader and cold-flashing)
|
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
As for firmware, I think you would need permission to host it. Check the ask the council thread, there is a link to discussin between sd69 and X fade |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
the FIASCO images would be RX-51_2009SE_10.2010.13-2.VANILLA_PR_EMMC_MR0_ARM.bin RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2.002_PR_COMBINED_002_ARM.bin for all regions? only the Latest ones as we only replicate Fremantle 1.3 repositories, right? |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
I think that all tools&packages from http://tablets-dev.nokia.com/ for n900 should be also dumped. |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
i'm running in some trouble with the packages files for the extras repositories. even though i only select binary_armel i still get binary_i386 and sources for about a 1000 packages; the binary_i386 wouldn't be such a problem, but for extras alone the source tar balls amount to over 75% of the size; not sure yet how it is w/ -testing & -dev, but i guess it should be about the same proportion the whole download binary_all & binary_armel (for NOKIA's repos, extras, cssu & amsn) amounts to 58GB. (on NOKIA's repos, the package are properly defined & selecting binary_armel only downloads the armel.deb packages thus your scripts work perfectly :cool:) no way this would fit on a N900, but even on a reasonably large PC (1TB storage?) it's... difficult to hide @ least :D with the whole binary_i386 & sources i guesstimate 120 to (@ most 150) GBs :confused: now to my point(s). considering that 'til 31-Dec-2012 the repository should remain available online, does it make sense to download the development packages for past that date? will the N900 / Maemo still be a valid development environment in 2013? i hope that my N900s will still run by then (knock knock) (my N95 still runs fine after 4 1/2 yrs...) thus having the armel runtime packages would make sense. i suspect that in extras some developers didn't bother specifying the architecture of each package, thus the architecture isn't cutting it :mad: i was thinking of modify your script(s) to (simply?) look for the ending of the file name. i hope to get the size of the download to some 20GB this way. do you see any problems reflashing a N900 & reloading all the packages (either with default backup in HAM or with FAM's application slist)? very optimistically, assuming a MeeGo handset gets so far that it is possible to run on the N900 as primary device (:o) would the Maemo sources be needed? the only reason i would see is to have some Qt (4?) apps that could be recompiled against a MeeGo SDK environment, considering that the 2013 apps on MeeGo (if it still exists....) will be designed for devices with much more then the N900's 256MB RAM. am i missing something? |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
my script first try to determinate package architecture repositories from Release file. If Release file is not found, then is used hardcoded architecture list in download script.
|
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
|
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
Quote:
Once I resolve the issue I have with chinook sources and apt-mirror, I'll post the mirror.list configuration. |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
@pali, which repository did not work with apt-mirror?
Perl is not my stronger point, but I would like to take a look. EDIT: I guess that could be this could be one of them: deb https://downloads.maemo.nokia.com/fremantle ssu apps Can you tell me what is used as username/password? |
Re: Future of Maemo 5 Fremantle
for downloads.maemo.nokia.com you need:
* send Basic HTTP authentication information (--auth-no-challenge for wget) * with login qa9recEP and password Pat2UGuP |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8