maemo.org - Talk
Page 7 of 8 « First 56 7 8
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   MeeGo / Harmattan (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=45)
-   -   Developer Mode Alternative? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=95335)

peterleinchen 2016-01-08 08:02
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
He wont need device for creating but testing (can be done by you).

TIA to ancelad
But please consider to make two different packages (one for N9 / one for N950)!

Ancelad 2016-01-08 09:36
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Ok, I will, but I should add specific N950 system-package as depends into control to prevent installation on N9. Could you tell me this package?

peterleinchen 2016-01-08 20:46
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Yep, of course :)

I guess easiest is meta package. I do not assume we have such enthusiast that have removed the meta package on N950 (especially without terminal ;)).

So package we depend on N950 will be
mp-harmattan-rm680-pr

Ancelad 2016-01-08 21:42
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Oh... I'm afraid to add this one :D

peterleinchen 2016-01-08 21:53
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancelad (Post 1494188)
Oh... I'm afraid to add this one :D
Nah, you do not need. :)

As I was writing I recognized everybody will only add/install your package after a reflash. Or in other words nobody is able to remove that mp without terminal (developer mode).

xelo 2016-01-27 20:34
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterleinchen (Post 1494175)
Yep, of course :)

So package we depend on N950 will be
mp-harmattan-rm680-pr
Speaking of it:
Is it safe to remove this package? For instance to update twitter libs and others (libgpg-error0 libogg0 liborganiser lzop usbutil)?

peterleinchen 2016-01-27 22:45
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
If you expect another PR update from ..... then do NOT remove this package ;)

But -without irony- this package has lots of reverse dependencies, so a lot of (almost all) packages will get removed, too. To what state your N950 will go I have no idea. There is some dedicated thread somewhere on TMO ...

TINK16 2016-03-20 04:59
Re: Some news about Mitakuuluu development
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by coderus (Post 1470413)
Thanks!!!! it worked and im downloading extra repos now :D:)

Ancelad 2016-06-28 12:26
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Dear N950's users, test please this package: https://www.dropbox.com/s/o4jtgs7ksh...armel.deb?dl=0

Be careful: it has mp-harmattan-rm680-pr as depends!

xelo 2016-06-28 19:12
Re: Developer Mode Alternative?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancelad (Post 1508548)
Dear N950's users, test please this package: https://www.dropbox.com/s/o4jtgs7ksh...armel.deb?dl=0

Be careful: it has mp-harmattan-rm680-pr as depends!
Thanks for your work!

Which tests would you like?

Why is this required in postinstall:
Code:
echo Remove all default offline repositories
SSUFILES=/etc/apt/sources.list.d/aegis.ssu-keyring-*.list
for f in $SSUFILES
do
: > $f
done
Does it make sense to rename the file "n9repomirror.list" to n950repomirror.list?


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49.
Page 7 of 8 « First 56 7 8
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8