![]() |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Devel
(SOLVED):D
Thnx to retsaw, the problem was solved. The problem occurred because I was rebooting the device while the hardware keyboard was closed. Code:
Hello guys |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
one thing I can be sure it covers very specific use scenario. the videos used to work on KP 49. After updating to KP50 my device come in weird state. after one or two reboots the state vanished, so i couldn't reproduce it anymore. (it started to work properly as my device was in usual state). I know that some uses of player triggered bugs in this state while other were perfectly okay. As MediaBox is only a wrapper and it uses backends from another players, I believe the difference was a backend, since codecs used for both videos triggered different backends (Mediabox basing on config and media type can choose backend automatically). Videos was just some people playing the instrument on youtube. The videos were directly downloaded from youtube (using a pc browser) and no changes were done since then. (the videos are SD quality but not scaled for the device). I even have two videos with same contents but one a flv and one an MP4 I believe (different copies from youtube server of same video). As formats were different and I mostly remember my config I'm sure one of triggered MAFW backend and the another triggered MPLAYER backend. But since the state which was able to trigger a bug was temporal, after rebooting I couldn't reproduce anymore (the baddie was reseted to something more rational). I may try to reproduce the same enviroment but even then I may fail to reproduce. So I'm useless to help, until someone trigger the same. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Devel
well, for some strange reason it seems it is better to do a full power-cycle after kernel reflash, I have some problems if doing a simple reboot with older kernels too.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Kernel-power version v50 is now in Extras-Testing.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
kernel power 50 doesnt have injection drivers? i installed it and cleven didnt work, so i installed KP46, i wanna update up to 49 unless u tell me the iyection thing is fixed :p
,any answers? great work tho cheers |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
It works, you just need to have updated drivers... Use the search, I am sure you can find it!
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
@freemangordon
So general problem is known and old: flashing kernel make battery machinery unstable until battery is physically reset (full charging cycle), and during that unstability weirdest bugs happen. On other side having to do full battery reset once reflash is small payoff for ability to use both VDD properly (you did it - nokia failed). @pali Funny - you did your best to make people find it - it's in first post. Still people happens to be unable to find it. However N900 is for geeks, even a geek can be dumb for a while (no offence to arnoldux personally). |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
I.E. 1. Switch off your N900 by means of actuating the mechanical bi-position power disruption dual location mechanical button switch. 2. Unplug the rear side battery holding compartment recess cover. 3. Dislocate the lithium-ion electro-chemical potential electrical energy holding cell from the recessed battery location birth. 4. Immediately after creating an electrical non potential between the chemical electrolyte capacity of the bl-5j cell, Insert the pre-charged battery cell into the now prostate N900 and impregnate it with chemical energy in order that it may live LIVE LIVE. GIVE IT LIFE. 4. Turn on your N900. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
@_@ Metal Gear Solid 2 flashback. One suggestion though, unless you were referring to putting the n900 somewhere inside the human anatomy, the word is "prostrate". xD
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
i tried to reduce resolution to DVD quality, the stutter is still there even though a little less than with 720p. Anyone able to help solving this? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Reboot bug still there... Edit: Unless if it was plugged on wall charger or USB on reboot.
:confused: Just curious: could someone take a look at this voltages and tell me if it's everythig ok? I mean, how could higher speeds uses lower voltage ? I'm sure its a dumb question but i couldn't resist. :D thanks current kernel configuration: current frequency: 900 supported frequencies: 125 250 500 550 600 720 805 850 900 950 1000 1100 1150 min. frequency: 250 max. frequency: 900 avoid frequencies: 125 active frequencies: 250:24,180 500:37,360 550:39,400 600:41,430 720:60,520 805:50,600 850:60,600 900:55,600 950:60,600 1000:60,600 1100:72,600 1150:72,600 SmartReflex VDD1=1, VDD2=1 governor ondemand: ignore nice load= 0, up threshold= 95, sampling rate= 300000, powersave bias= 0 |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
@vi_
sure but guys like me with only one batterry have to recharge it to max, or perhaps even full recharge cycle (to min and back to max). It's annoying but acceptable since people do not reflash kernel each 2 weeks, and your kernel is already much better than nokia's one. So I already said the small anoyance once month or two is tiny payoff for having your kernel which have so many shiny abilities which nokias one doesn't have and at once have most current version. Yeah sure I will not use every ability once a month, but you already done VDD1 and VDD2 working (even for overclock) which makes device use batterry less which is everyday profit from using your version of kernel. Cheers pali, freemangordon and your team! |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Hi thanks for this power kernel 50 but i have a problem, my gps not work yet.
Please can help me to fix this problem? I use GPSjinni, Sygic 10, GPSdata, but nothing. Thanks for all. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Is it not working at all, or just taking a very long time to get a fix? If you use network positioning you might want to change the server from Nokia's supl.nokia.com to Google's supl.google.com, one of my N900s takes ages to get a fix using Nokia's server while for some reason the other only takes a minute or two, until I switched to using Google's servers, which seems to enable both N900s to get a GPS fix quickly.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Hi Everyone,
I'm not sure if this is a KP problem (happened when I upgraded KP), but I can't get ussd commands to work from the phone app anymore although it used to. I have ussd common installed along with KP50 & latest CSSU 3.1. So basically #220* for example doesn't work anymore on the phone application & gives "No celluar connection available". Let's debug :D |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Hi!i have Fanoush boot menu installed.
i succesfuly installed kernel power 2.6.28-10power50 kernel power settings_0.14 kernel power modules 2.6.28-10power50 kernel power bootimg 2.6.28-10power50 restart phone with keyboard open and selected in boot menu maemo 5 with kernel-power 2.6.28 and i get a white screen and up the message Code:
"Booting from (mtdblock4 jffs2)..." what am i doing wrong? Sorry for the noobish question but i am newbie in kernel issues and for bad english! Thanks! |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Yesterday I decided to disable ramzswap module, I just renamed file /lib/modules/.../ramzwap.ko. Phone became so fast...
Why is it enabled by default? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Why? cat /proc/swaps - I saw ramzwap before disabling.
I didn't enabled it explicitly. I have installed compcache-tools, nothing more I did. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
BTW renaming module is *not* good way of disabling it :p
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
Maybe because something insmods it explicitly. ramzswap is initialized just in the middle of startup process: Code:
... |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
@ForeverYoung:
Try to: cd /etc grep -ir ramzswap * |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
Nothing......... |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
my phone rebooted thrice in just an hour. when i was using internet. i dont know whats causing the reboot. and when checked via healthcheck. the boot reason is: 32wd_to. i dont kno what does that mean.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
is it overclocked? IMO it's just unstable. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
yes it is. too 900. i ran it for like a month in these overclock settings
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
i hav installed batterypatch now. what do u suggest? should i use it or i shud not? ur views abt bp?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
For Christ's sake, You were told already, zillion of times, to not use crapterry patches. You even argued about it with much more knowledgeable ones than You. Now, asking the same question again? GTFO from kp thread,, into <whatever>patch one, please?
/Estel |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
Quote:
please change this person's name to trisha02 version 1-2 please post at it's dedicated thread for you question : *SO YOU DON'T BUG OTHER THREADS* check this http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=3000 however later versions are even better the dev finally gave up 125mhz in underclock and used 500mhz in overclock profile. i can say it's now very good application NOW PLEASE DON'T ASK THIS QUESTION AGAIN AS YOU HAVE JUST DONE |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v50 in Extras-Testing
I apologize for the length of this post, I just had to post my appreciation of this amazing piece of work.
I upgraded 9 days ago from KP49 after reading through many dozens of posts to make sure I wouldn't run into any problems. I'm not using the FM transmitter boost program, nor am I (currently) using any of the boot menus available or any battery patches or other such tweaks, so I went for it - and I couldn't be happier with my N900! The upgrade could not have been easier, and the difference in smoothness is staggering! Seriously, a kernel change should not make this much of a difference! :) Of course, I'm running CSSU Testing (21.2011.38-1Tmaemo3.1), so I'm sure that plays a huge part too... likely the difference I'm seeing is due to the combination of the two. That said, the difference wasn't truly noticeable until KP50. I've noticed a reduction in battery usage, though I haven't measured anything so I can't provide hard numbers. Another thing I noticed is the swap usage is considerably less over time than I previously had. I've always noticed that when my N900 was lagging badly (like when trying to answer it when ringing), I was well over 200MB into swap. It seems 210MB is the magic point where it is downright painful (and embarrassing) to use. I do tend to abuse it by leaving too many browser windows open at the same time, on pages I want to go back to and read later. Due to the way many pages are written, I usually end up with creeping memory usage until the phone is almost unusable. However, after this upgrade, I noticed it seems much less aggressive at swapping out apps. When I expected it to be nearing 200MB, swap was only at 157MB. I noticed today a slight bit of lag when unlocking the phone (I do use the numeric lock), and I just looked (with 11 windows of various apps, including the browser) and I'm using 218MB of swap. I'm quite surprised as at this point it used to be painful switching between apps... it's not! So, in short - if I had more time I'd be digging through your patches as I'm curious what kind of changes you made to make this dramatic an improvement. I've been considering the N9 for a while ('cept it still costs too @(#& much for a device with no warranty in the US), but now I think I can hold off longer (the other problems can't be fixed by software changes, the screen is too small for my aging eyes and the poorly-designed proximity sensor is too sensitive for the heavy IR in S. Florida). I haven't overclocked since KP47, I may just try it again with this kernel. :) Thank you very much for making my N900 feel better than brand new! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:14. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8