![]() |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Is it just me, or did the OOM get really bad in this release?
I think it is even worse than before they fixed it in the beginning of this year. For example, just now - I had 4 (!) apps open - two random native apps (not resource hungry), browser with one tab loaded (some mobile website) and LLs Video Player with a paused video. I wanted to continue playing the video, so I clicked on it, but the app cover started loading again. The OOM must have killed it and I lost the progress of the video. What's worse, I had no idea the app wasn't running until I reopened it. This really reminds me of Android where you can never be sure what's running and what's not, but Android at least has a possibility to suspend those apps without losing the state, unlike SailfishOS (I'm not saying I want it, I just want to have my apps running). I'm quite mad right now... If I at least knew OOM killed it, but finding out this way... EDIT: It did it again! Apps open:
I never had problems with these apps in the previous releases. Now the video got killed again! And again, I noticed only after wanting to resume the video. EDIT 2: Please vote on these two questions: |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
I don't have problems with OOM though. I've been having a couple of Android apps browser and bunch of other apps open all day and they haven't been dying. Just to test the blurred cover feature I had to open like 12-15 apps before the first one died. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Actually, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier to just steal the concept of the OS X Dock completely. All running apps have their icons automatically inserted at the end of the dock; the user has the ability to rearrange icons at will; icons are removed from the dock when the app exits, unless the user explicitly chooses to keep them in the dock; all icons can be animated to provide additional information to the user; and an unlimited number of commands can be issued to the app from the icon using a context menu. In short, the Dock is doing exactly what the Sailfish Home Screen is trying to do: both task management and app interaction. It gets away with this by hiding all interaction commands behind a context menu. Because there are no visible interaction controls taking up screen space, the Dock does a very good job of intuitive task management (and can also put a lot of icons on the screen in a very small space). Again, this is me beating the same drum again: the Home Screen should focus on either Task Management or App Interaction, not try to do both at the same time. :) |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
I really hate this swipe left or right to unlock, swiping down is just so much more comfortable to me.
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Thanks ! |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Well what I don't like on the muting options is, that I can't use ringring restorer anymore. now we need an ambiance restorer.
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
After some days with it, I don't miss the swipe-down-to-lock gesture anymore.
Before 1.1.9.x when I wanted to lock the phone, I always had to swipe from the side to get to the homescreen and then swipe down to lock. Now I only have to swipe down and push the button where the thumb is already. That's a lot less thumb acrobatic IMHO. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
(and a dedicated lock/unlock slider would be even better ;-) ) |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
No icon (only number of new e-mails) is shown in lock-screen for my exchange e-mail account.
In contrast for Gmail account both icon and number of new mails shows correctly. Anyone else having having the same problem ? |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
They broke sdcard access in Android again...
https://together.jolla.com/question/...ed-on-sd-card/ *sigh* |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
My clock cover is nothing like in this screenshot:
https://cdn-blog.jolla.com/wp-conten...15/09/home.jpg I see a digital clock instead of the analog one, any ideas? |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
No need to activate the screen, swipe away the lockscreen and then select the application to get back to. BTW, that's really something Sailfish OS needs to improve - you should be able to get back to the last used application instead of being dumped to the home screen every time. It is super annoying at some times. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Been playing with this for 24hrs and I have mixed feelings.
The events view is a welcome change, and I can appreciate the status bar. I do miss the pull down menu for quick shortcuts though. I used to access Settings from that, which was a handy way to access the connection options after they removed the option to choose a connection from the browser. The quick launch (phone, browser, message, camera) bar is useless now. You can only pull it up if you have no apps open. Otherwise you have to bring up the applications view. On the subject of the browser, when this is in card view and you want to return to full screen, if you catch the bottom edge the browser will go to the search/shortcut screen. This feels like they are moving away from the concept of a single handed navigation paradigm of the initial design. And the I am experiencing screen tear in the browser when viewing long page (notably reddit threads). My Jolla did this when it was still vanilla but has not in other updates from Dec onwards. One big plus is that I do find the Jolla does connect to mobile networks after comming out of black spots much quicker. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150704...opmentroadmap/ ◾On unlocking, return to the last used app instead of home |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
I think personaly this version is really great. Especially because it dramatically simplifies the usage of the phone. Think of the 1.1.7 and previous versions, we had 2 kinds of swipes, swipes from the edge of the swipes and "normal" swipes from anywhere "within" the screen area.
No, all of this is pretty gone and you have only one kind of gesture (from "within" the screen area) + swipe from the top edge. This is far easier to understand and use. Also, personaly, I applaud the removal of the cover swipes. I never understood the added value of swipes on covers where buttons would be far far better. Halleluya! I just can't understand and don't appreciate the different graphical "languages" on the top of the screen when we have: - The notifications - The slider (volume, remorse timer, etc) - The countdown for example when you install/remove something from OpenRepos. In the same location of the screen, having 3 different types of data with their own graphical convention is somewhat confusing to me. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Edit: From an interview with Marc Dillon: Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Consistent? Definitely. Intuitive? Definitely not! The new interface may have lost some of that consistency but it made up to it a thousand times with a much increased intuitivity. This comes from someone who has used Jolla for a year and was very familiar with the interface, so you cannot accuse me of confusing intuitivity with familiarity. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Sailfish 2.x seems to be an admission that people are too stupid to use screwdrivers. There was a learning curve with 1.x but with it came genuine functionality. I used edge swipes and cover actions all the time. I'd quite often use the multi tasking view to refresh email, tweetian and change music without entering each app. It's a real shame that has gone. All for the sake of people who can only operate hammers. If I was redesigning it, I'd keep the cover actions, use edge swipes for the carousel, ditch the swipe up for apps (I never used swipe up in 1.x) and stick the app grid where they want to stick the partner space (ditch partner space). Also, ditch ambiances for an n9 style pull down top menu with quick access to volume and settings. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
The remorse pop-up is kinda tricky in this regard. Perhaps it needs two actions: tap here to change your mind or here to do the action right away. The default would be as it it, perform the action when it times out. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
For a gesture based os I find the settings menu "gestures" surprisingly empty.
Can I just choose if I will use the trusty swipe cover actions instead of the limited, push buttons? If this is a test to see which one of both we like the most I confirm that I now miss the swipe cover actions which I took for granted as main feature of the OS. In retrospect, should I have made a poem about those to confirm Marc & Co about their genius? The only time a non Saiflish user used the word "cool" about Sailfish was when I demonstrated the cover actions. The hammering world is not too stupid to use screws and screwdriver but they need to be informed and reminded now and then about the "revolutionary new way of..". I expected the number of swipe cover actions to be extended with the tablet OS having more display real estate available. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
One thing I really like about 2.0 is that starting apps no longer steal focus from you when ready. Thus I can chain start several apps and only the last one will show on screen when ready. Even Android apps heed to this rule. :)
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
https://together.jolla.com/question/...-to-ambiances/ |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
I'll have to add in my observations as everybody else seems to have an opinion to share, too :D
First thing, it seems that not a lot has changed, only some small things. However it does of course feel that workflows are not so automatic since I've gotten used to the way SFOS worked for almost 2 years. Most annoying thing is the missed opportunity of having the 2 sideways swipes, as both "in-screen-swipe" and "from-edge-swipe" perform the same action, rotating the carousel. It still escapes my reasoning why carousel could not be activated from edge swipe and in-screen swipe be reserved for cover actions. I liked the cover swipe better than the button approach. The swipe-from-top to change ambience or lock device is OK, I mostly use it to lock the device anyway or set it to silent mode and that's still OK. One thing I missed from previous version, which still is not implemented is possibility to lock device with ons swipe when I have an applcation in the front; I need to first swipe off sideways and only after that swile down to lock. What I'd like to see si to lock the device without killing thew app, using for example an L-shaped swipe or something. |
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: First thoughts about the (pre) Sailfish OS 2.0
Quote:
https://cdn.society6.com/cdn/0025/p/...4252418_lz.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:09. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8