![]() |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 looks more appealing to the Xoom to me. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
http://www.imgtec.com/news/release/index.asp?newsid=449 Imgtec create the chips, and they claim with double the cores you roughly double the power. They claim the quadcore model delivers ~133M PPS. So the dualcore (SGX543MP2) must be at least 67M PPS. Which means the solo-core SGX543 should be at least 34M PPS. See how it compliments your previous link? But 67MPPS is awefully low, considering the 543 has some advantages over the 540 and its dual-core, would mean theoretically is should be above 180MPPS (Imgtec's claim). So somewhere Imgtec stuffed up (I believe it was in the announcement of the SGX540's performance). But have a look at these raw figures: Apple claims x9 the grunt which would mean: 273MPPS Benchmarked against the iPad, it should be: 148MPPS Benchmarked against the XOOM, it should be: 153MPPS Anadtech's benchmark overall would put it: 202MPPS So if I had to guestimate with all of these figures floating around, I would say 130-150MPPS (more closer to 150M). So yeah, I did my homework but what grade I get won't be known until several months from now. By the way CC, I'm interested in what you believe the PPS for the SGX543MP2 is. Quote:
Couldn't agree more, we must think of time as progressive rather than cyclic if we are to believe in change. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
So it was probable for Jobs to launch a 10" 1080p tablet and still call it a 'retina display'.. (though I've no idea how cheap/available were 10" 1080p screens). You know Jobs... he would dance around the audience (and facts) like a snake charmer and screw us all from behind... :D (and everybody will still be smiling all the while) ps: i'm witholding the butter, cause I don't want you to eat the hat... uncooked :D |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
Looking back, I'm rather ashamed at my behaviour. Just one of those days I suppose. Quote:
|
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
|
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
For example: A big push among mobile chipset makers is OpenCL integration. This allows for the GPU to be used in a general way in applications for crunching computationally intense tasks. OpenCL can be used for real-time video editing, image processing, calculations, etc, or many other compute heavy tasks -- in a highly efficient way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL Simply put, I think that in ~2 years mobile SoCs will be able to compete on a performance level with full-fledged entry level laptops and computers (well beyond ATOM). Weather you're using CAD, or editing video/audio, it will be possible on the coming generation of mobile SoCs. Interestingly, Imagination, makers of the aforementioned SGX543MP, has announced that their SGX5xx line will support openCL (1.0) with new, upcoming drivers! :eek: http://www.imgtec.com/News/Release/index.asp?NewsID=610 Apple made a bang-on decision going with Imagination; they have a proven track record, and are simply ahead of the competition. For example, reference designs of ARMs next-gen Mali T604 have *just* begun to make their way into the hands of OEMs, meaning that Mali will only start to compete in around 2 years in regards to OpenCL.* * this information comes from an interview with Jim Davies (VP of technology in the Media Processing Division of ARM) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccsqedOeF_M I'm not aware of another SoC on the market that has OpenCL support. Microsoft's Win8 strategy will be interesting. I'm guessing that they are going to offer some form of backward compatibility, likely by porting all of their APIs and translating x86 code to ARM code automatically on the platform. The Win8 APIs will likely center around C# and the Common Language Runtime for portability to other architectures. But it's only a guess! |
Re: Apple iPad 2
"will ship in 3-4 weeks"... WTF dude. Does this mean that after I hit "place order" button, someone at Apple picked up a phone and called Foxconn in Longhua, China - you know everything is made by Foxconn. Everything. - to let them know they can start building me one?
Not that I was going to wait outside an Apple Store for 9 hours just to get one. I mean it's cool and all but it is just a f***in tablet, not the cure for cancer. Can't wait. Wait, yes I can. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
It seems that the iPad may have some non-tegra Android competition after all.
A mysterious HTC tablet has seemingly popped on to the map. http://images.androidcentral.com/sit...ts-release.jpg If it's anything like the maddeningly-delayed thunderbolt and the playbook, it may house the MSM8660: a dual-core snapdragon (scorpion cores) at a blistering 1.2GHz and a very powerful Adreno 220 GPU from the once popular ATI (bought out by Qualcomm). http://androidandme.com/2011/02/news...dreno-220-gpu/ http://www.qualcomm.com/videos/snapd...inds-game-demo (1080p in stereo -- framerate unknown) Details on the GPU are sparse, but I suspect it will blow the pants off of the T20 and roughly compare to the SGX543MP in performance. |
Re: Apple iPad 2
Quote:
|
Re: Apple iPad 2
I don't particulary like the way modern technology and innovation is applied in today's market.
First, the trend used to be like this: New gadgets such as smartphones were striving to be more like a pc. Nowadays companies such as Apple bring new divices to the market wich most people don't really need, for mostly simple tasks such as email, reading, web, simple gaming. Some functions work more conveniantly than on a smartphone or pc, but it's still not much more pockatable than a notebook (wich can do alot more). By smart marketing they create a new category of products that is appealing and will sell to end-users and you know why it sells don't you? Pc-like striving is still there, but the simpeler devices sell better. This leads to my second point, the populatity rules the market and therefore heists innovation (sort of). Companies smell money and invest in such a category, trying to benefit from the rising market. New and good hardware is put in devices that don't really need it, and often in a closed ecosystem. This disappoints me, where I'd rather see good hardware put to its maximum use, preferably in an open envoirment. Open-sourse will never disappear, but because popularity rules we will first see innovative hardware on (partially) closed platforms, leaving the unpopular open-source products to follow in its footsteps with often outdated specs. Thats why I love the N900, its a rare case of good (up to date) hardware matching a unique piece of open software. That does not happen very often, that's why I'd love to see MeeGo evolve and actually hit the market.;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:35. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8