![]() |
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
|
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Weelll @coderus is absolutely correct, since flasher is just about the only thing we cannot easily make by ourselves.
Everything else I need I can make or port to the device. |
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
|
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
I guess Myriad restrictions regarding Alien Dalvik, or Google, or Oracle, I don't know. If you think carefully, all ports of SailfishOS to other devices miss the android compatibility feature. And since the users himself can use the hardware adaptation toolkit... Place your bets on why.
|
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
|
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
The CTO (Stefano Mosconi) of Jolla said they are working on it. So yes it will come.
Also Stskeeps said a while ago on IRC that it's not a licensing issue, but more a technical. |
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
|
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
1. Define "main source of apps" - to me it is way more important to have proper IMAP/XMPP support than netflix for example. What is your flavour of preference? Everybody is different and I did mention in a later post that you could arguably use TJC for Jolla to find out what's "important" and they can _potentially_ invest some time in making their own applications for those non standard services. 2. Maemo5/N9 was initiated by a company that [still] has a lot more resources than Jolla, so understandably they could make things happen a lot quicker. Like you say, Alien Dalvik is good for addition of applications that won't be there quickly for Sailfish. Dave999 quoted Netflix and Chromecast as examples - to me they are irrelevant, hence my counter argument. FWIW, Netflix could just use HTML5 and every browser compatible with that technology would be able to use it. Problem solved. I don't really know what use I could give a google dongle, so I'll refrain to comment. |
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
Quote:
But here we are 16 months later and, whilst Jolla have busily been patching and updating Sailfish, it still doesn't meet the promise that Jolla originally held out. And I'm increasingly beginning to feel that many of those who defend the current Jolla phone are subject to the free-choice paradigm of cognitive dissonance. For example, and in response to your question, the store still doesn't have the capability to charge for apps. So if I'm a developer what do I do? If I create free apps, and I've got one that works on Android (and thus Alien Dalvik) why, when I probably have limited resources, waste time creating a native Sailfish version? And if I create apps that need to be paid for, well I'm out of luck. So basically most apps, and certainly most mainstream apps (and a fair number of niche apps - I don't expect my bank to be writing a native Sailfish banking app anytime soon) are only going to be available on the Jolla as Android apps. So it isn't a question of wanting Android apps; it is a question of only being offered Android apps. |
Re: sailfishOS Upgrade12 discussions
^^^ is exactly why I never could convince myself to part with my money for a Jolla. It simply never felt worth even a fraction of its price after the initial euphoria died down. I was one of those who were taken in for their fancy marketing terms like etrazz (spelling?) display etc but when I saw the specs and found them to be a downgrade compared to the i9305 I was using at that time it became a big No-no.
Nothing from then on has made me regret my decision regardless of how much I want them to make me regret it. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8