maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Moderators (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=28675)

Texrat 2009-12-15 23:04

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CrashandDie (Post 429706)
Interesting to see that the c-word isn't banned.

It was left intact just for Qwerty's use.

silvermountain 2009-12-16 07:21

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CrashandDie (Post 421858)
Hi everyone,

I would like to volunteer to be a category moderator, considering that I've been putting in quite a lot of thread flags to request for moderators to move them around as needed -- and I realise this is not the intended use of the "Flag This" feature.

Quick question, up to what point is it possible to filter out the rights of a moderator?

I suggest taking a look at many of the posts that CrashandDie have made here - they are often both angry and demeaning. Not something I think a moderator should express.

RevdKathy 2009-12-16 07:43

Re: Moderators
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by qwerty12 (Post 429674)
Texrat,

**** yeah! Kill the N900 haters and castrate the ****ers!
.

Is that in the wrong order? I mean, bit of a waste of time after you've already killed 'em...

I'm with Texrat on this one. There's something about the degree of rabble rousing froma few certain individuals that suggest they're not here to be useful contributing members. I'm not talking about people who make constructive criticisms or who dare to believe that n900 is less than God's best gift since Christmas, but a few people who seem to delight in rabble rousing.

Mind, it might help if the rabble weren't quite so willing to be roused...

noobmonkey 2009-12-16 08:25

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RevdKathy (Post 430087)
Is that in the wrong order? I mean, bit of a waste of time after you've already killed 'em...

I'm with Texrat on this one. There's something about the degree of rabble rousing froma few certain individuals that suggest they're not here to be useful contributing members. I'm not talking about people who make constructive criticisms or who dare to believe that n900 is less than God's best gift since Christmas, but a few people who seem to delight in rabble rousing.

Mind, it might help if the rabble weren't quite so willing to be roused...

awwwwwww - Kathy's being Troll'ist!!!

I say feed the trolls, feed the trolls!!! - oh hang on a minute - we're talking about rabbles, not trolls..... Screw the trolls, slap the rabble rousers :)

RevdKathy 2009-12-16 18:20

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by noobmonkey (Post 430138)
awwwwwww - Kathy's being Troll'ist!!!

I say feed the trolls, feed the trolls!!! - oh hang on a minute - we're talking about rabbles, not trolls..... Screw the trolls, slap the rabble rousers :)

It was the cutest troll image I could find. ;)

CrashandDie 2009-12-16 19:05

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by silvermountain (Post 430066)
I suggest taking a look at many of the posts that CrashandDie have made here - they are often both angry and demeaning. Not something I think a moderator should express.

I know my writing style isn't the most gentle to say the least, however I am never truly angry. Yes, I can be rough, but it is not because I am to the point that I am therefore humiliating anyone; at least that's never my intention.

This being said, should you want to argue your point with a few examples in a private message, I'd love to see things through your eyes. Going through my messages quickly I had to go to the 3rd or 4th page of messages to start seeing some that are a bit rough.

Texrat 2009-12-16 19:15

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CrashandDie (Post 430813)
I know my writing style isn't the most gentle to say the least, however I am never truly angry. Yes, I can be rough, but it is not because I am to the point that I am therefore humiliating anyone; at least that's never my intention.

This being said, should you want to argue your point with a few examples in a private message, I'd love to see things through your eyes. Going through my messages quickly I had to go to the 3rd or 4th page of messages to start seeing some that are a bit rough.

and that ^ is the hallmark of a good moderator-- not politically "correct" perfection.

GeneralAntilles 2009-12-16 21:00

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by silvermountain (Post 430066)
I suggest taking a look at many of the posts that CrashandDie have made here - they are often both angry and demeaning. Not something I think a moderator should express.

The same should apply to everyday members, too. :)

Flandry 2009-12-16 21:13

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 429671)
Just a minor rant about moderation...

As expected, we have had a huge influx of noisy members recently. That is not meant to broadly slam anyone and in fact I'm gonna get real specific.

Out of that number we have a handful who *appear* to have an agenda here that even transcends constructive criticism. Personally I don't care if they're paid shills, diehard Nokia haters or just sociopathic forum joyriders but I have a big problem with letting a tiny, screaming, effusive minority damage the otherwise beautiful tenor of this forum.

To that end, I wish for a slight change to moderation, ie, that a pattern of bad behavior means as much as if not more than certain obvious violations.

I really believe that handling these few toxic human singularities will go a long way toward minimizing noise and restoring decorum to the forum. I'm disappointed they have been allowed to persist with no obvious repercussions despite flagrant poisoning of the place...

Here's a thought... can we make a probationary period on new accounts creating a new thread? If someone couldn't sign up and make a thread the same minute, it would probably filter out some of the trolls and noise.

mannakiosk 2009-12-16 22:58

Re: Moderators
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flandry (Post 431016)
Here's a thought... can we make a probationary period on new accounts creating a new thread? If someone couldn't sign up and make a thread the same minute, it would probably filter out some of the trolls and noise.

The benefits of that approach would have to be weighed against the inconvenience (and resulting consequences) for new users who sign up just to post a unique insightful thread with potential to enrich the lives of all community members.

I'm not saying I have an opinion on which should weigh more. Just throwing this out there for consideration.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8