maemo.org - Talk
Page 9 of 11 « First 78 9 1011
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Applications (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Pianobar port - command line Pandora client (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=38786)

fatalsaint 2010-02-17 15:08
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 531849)
PyQt could squeeze in on less (and into less conspicuous places), but sadly Qt takes it's space-toll in any case.
Yeah.. I guess I shouldn't place blame always on PyQt when it's PyQt + Qt both that take up the space. I don't think it's that bad on the N900 because it already has the base QT libs right? Or is it that the new QT libs are currently optified, but will be non-optified with PR1.2?

attila77 2010-02-18 15:58
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
The latter. It seems they will put 4.6 in libq4-* (which will likely have a provides: libqt4-maemo5-* tag), and so 4.6 will get un-optified in PR1.2. Of the base libs, IIRC you have QtCore and QtXml installed in the PR.

fatalsaint 2010-02-18 17:49
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 534637)
The latter. It seems they will put 4.6 in libq4-* (which will likely have a provides: libqt4-maemo5-* tag), and so 4.6 will get un-optified in PR1.2. Of the base libs, IIRC you have QtCore and QtXml installed in the PR.
What I question then is how much more space it will require. People already report that out of the box with nothing else installed they have something like 80MB free in rootfs..

A single update required 40MB.. meaning that's there very, very little wiggle room on that rootfs.

daperl 2010-02-18 18:39
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 534637)
The latter. It seems they will put 4.6 in libq4-* (which will likely have a provides: libqt4-maemo5-* tag), and so 4.6 will get un-optified in PR1.2. Of the base libs, IIRC you have QtCore and QtXml installed in the PR.
After installing PR1.2, can you think of any downsides to manually optifying the Qt stuff?

Bratag 2010-02-18 18:42
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by daperl (Post 534981)
After installing PR1.2, can you think of any downsides to manually optifying the Qt stuff?
Long as you put the optified libs in a location the system knows about you should be fine, or symlinks back to I assume /usr/lib. Downside is that if they release a new version you will have to go through the process again

daperl 2010-02-18 19:14
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bratag (Post 534990)
Long as you put the optified libs in a location the system knows about you should be fine, or symlinks back to I assume /usr/lib. Downside is that if they release a new version you will have to go through the process again
I'm sure what you say is true, but then the truly bold should be able to optify the entire /usr directory and avoid redoing any symlinks. The only questions remaining would be the speed differences between the storage media and/or file system types.

attila77 2010-02-18 19:20
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatalsaint (Post 534880)
What I question then is how much more space it will require. People already report that out of the box with nothing else installed they have something like 80MB free in rootfs..

A single update required 40MB.. meaning that's there very, very little wiggle room on that rootfs.
I asked the same question on maemo-devel just a day ago and got the answer that I should excercise some patience and there is a Plan for this, presented in advance of the PR1.2 release.

Quote:
After installing PR1.2, can you think of any downsides to manually optifying the Qt stuff?
Functional, no (apart from potential speed differences). The danger I can think of is that you risk future breakage (say, if they decide to optify or move the libs in a hipothetical PR1.3)

rmarcus 2010-04-18 22:25
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Hey guys! What's with the proxy settings inside the config file for those who are not in the US?
Should it work the way it is? Cause it is not working here...

Any thoughts?

Thanx!

fatalsaint 2010-04-18 22:27
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmarcus (Post 616773)
Hey guys! What's with the proxy settings inside the config file for those who are not in the US?
Should it work the way it is? Cause it is not working here...

Any thoughts?

Thanx!
It should work after you've put in the address a real proxy server into the config file. But I have not used it.

zappa 2010-04-19 15:22
Re: Pianobar port - command line Pandora client
 
Pandora changed the api I guess. Could you recompile the new pianobar lib for us please. :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23.
Page 9 of 11 « First 78 9 1011
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8