maemo.org - Talk - Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 1028216)

AIUI Bada is a pluggable kernel architecture, so yes, can have a Linux core (or at least the Samsung Bada docs claim so).

Okay, so how about oses-and-applications-mostly-related-to-the-nokia-NIT-line-including-but-not-limited-to-Maemo-Harmattan-MeeGo-or-competing-devices-running-derivatives-of-these.org ? I mean, we can go all nitpicky, I just don't see why MeeGo is the place where you draw the line.

I'm not convinced any lines need to be drawn. We should cater for whatever people want to talk about. If it's not a common interest, those threads will have (0 replies) and no harm done. Seriously, am I the only one that still uses internettablettalk.com ?

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

maemo = Live your dream
meego = Dream your life
--------------------------
I would rather making a better os from maemo and talk all around the forum about it and leave Meego to (strictly) its section

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

I think my bookmark is still pointed to http://www.internettablettalk.com/forums . It redirects to tmo now.

Sometimes I still wonder if we'll go back to the more os agnostic ways before the itt->maemo shift...

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 1028216)

:D Let me rephrase this. talk.maemo.org is way too specific if other stuff is to be included, such as MeeGo. I really don't care what OS'es are included (or allowed, or appropriate or politically correct by consensus on this board or liked by the moderators or whatever), but please don't call it maemo-something. The only thing in common is the N900, why not call it that? (I know what will respond, so please don't...)

List of appropriate conduct regarding OS'es on TMO:
Maemo - yes (but criticism of the OS and the apps is NOT allowed)
MeeGo - yes (but criticism of the non-working OS and questions regarding why it never is working is NOT allowed)
WP - yes (but ONLY criticism is allowed, must also include Elop is a fart)
Android - somewhat allowed, but keep it quiet.
iOS - not considered an OS.
Symbian - 95% don't have the faintest idea what Symbian really is anyway around here, but it's Nokia so OK.
Bada - Never mention Bada, you get refraction points mentioning it, I did.

Good day :D

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1028230)

That's fine. Now let ME correct the below:

Quote:

List of appropriate conduct regarding OS'es on TMO:
Maemo - yes (but criticism of the OS and the apps is NOT allowed)

False. True criticism is always allowed. Bashing, trolling and juvenile behaviors are not.

Quote:

MeeGo - yes (but criticism of the non-working OS and questions regarding why it never is working is NOT allowed)

Again false. Same principles as applied to Maemo discussion.

Quote:

WP - yes (but ONLY criticism is allowed, must also include Elop is a fart)

I have to assume you're being purely facetious there so no comment.

Quote:

Android - somewhat allowed, but keep it quiet.

False. Just keep the Android discussion in the appropriate section OR use it elsewhere in reasonable contexts.

Quote:

iOS - not considered an OS.

What???

Quote:

Symbian - 95% don't have the faintest idea what Symbian really is anyway around here, but it's Nokia so OK.

That 95% figure is far off the mark.

Quote:

Bada - Never mention Bada, you get refraction points mentioning it, I did.

False. Refraction points are given for rules violations, not mere mention of an OS. If you were the one spamming with "bada rox!" tags, that may have been the reason. Regardless, it wasn't for anything as innocent as you allege.

EDIT: d'oh! INfraction points (thanks sjgadsby)

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 1028241)

That's fine. Now let ME correct the below:

I believe the OP intended those points as a humorous/sarcastic remark.

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 1028301)

I believe the OP intended those points as a humorous/sarcastic remark.

I started out thinking so, myself, but the bada mark persuaded me otherwise. But if ericsson says I got it wrong (and he didn't earlier, when he was here), I will gladly acknowledge that. The problem is I've seen those points seriously alleged too many times here...

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1028230)

Bada - Never mention Bada, you get refraction points mentioning it, I did.

Yes, watch yourself or I'll raise your refractive index again.

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 1028312)

Yes, watch yourself or I'll raise your refractive index again.

I don't think that will help him focus :)

Re: Should MeeGo developers continue to publish info on this forum for maemo users (wrt Nokia device support)?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 1028312)

Yes, watch yourself or I'll raise your refractive index again.

lol... I can't believe I missed that...