![]() |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Thanks works for wifite.py :D But when you run ettercap(not through YAMAS) it has also to the problem of /tmp being to small and stops after some time with capturing
So that's why I asked too ;) |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Quote:
Code:
ln -s /tmp/ /opt/ Be brave and find out for the rest of us. |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Dudes, resizing your /tmp is only until you reboot, so /opt problem solved. Wanna hack, get 31MB free, you still would have to.
vi_, '%TMPDIR' is believe what is in wifite.py, so your command might not work, no idea. You seem to be mighty linux guy, can/could you pinpoint the part in wifitie.py that dumps ivs there and deletes on exit? It always uses wep01.ivs filename, and with -p0841 attack it would be really great if it dumped it and not delete after unsuccessful crack. Sometimes running twice/thrice is required. |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Quote:
tmp is defined at the start of the program using python mkdtemp function/call/thingy. If you felt that non-removal of -p0841 files would be of benefit I highly suggest you get in contact with the creator of wifite.py. I am not keen to 'butcher' his work and break compatibility with future upgrades. |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Tried to, no reply so far (1 month) which is why I'm reaching to other people. If it's addition (or removal) of one line, doesn't seem that butchery to me :P
<edit> Still after each update we have to change AUTOCRACK=9000 to a higher value as that kills N900 processor and is highly unlikely in most situations |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
After some test I see that rootfs space is unaffected by thhe space of /tmp/
I made tmp 16'MB and coppied a musicfile of 8MB to it, ran df -h and I saw that rootfs space still was the same ;) So god knows where the space from /tmp is pulled from :O as opt didn't change also... gonna investigate if we can set 32MB as default of /tmp on boot... edit: Never changed autocrack value :P Just put that ***** on 1GHZ and you have the key in les than 4 minutes ;) |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
As N900 seems to have a limit of around 200 packets/second it takes 6-7mins to get 50000 ivs which normally is enough. I noticed that -p0481 attacks sometimes generates dubiuos data, which is why I would love for Wifite script to dump it and append as 2-3 attacks is enough (maybe I got lucky and there was casual user in the meantime, no idea) in most cases.
|
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Yes I had a pm with agogdata yesterday and I already told him that the pps limit is better to be set to 200 pps as it will work better for longer ranges and its a reasonable value for a mobile device :D
Yesterday I had cracked my own Network and that was to be exactly in 3 minutes and 36 seconds ;) That's the ideal situation tho :p |
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
Yeah, with signal around -50 my own went swiftly in around 4 mins. In most _working_ cases it's 85-90 and gettin 100+ is excellent. Having to manually copy the ivs from auto-tool is a biatch though
|
Re: [ announce ] hackattack!
I'm just curious, can WPA networks be cracked ? cause it asks for a dictionary.
and upgrading wifite (thanks to mr_pingu) seems to work better but still no luck with cracking |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8