maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   News (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=23677)

qole 2008-09-22 20:05

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles (Post 224934)
I call BS. My bet's on Q1 2009.

Well, they told us straight out that the beta SDK won't be released until March 2009. Would they really release a new piece of hardware at the same time as the beta SDK?

sjgadsby 2008-09-22 20:11

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226233)
I was expecting Igor to show up...

He was there. I watched him give his part of a presentation. I believe you were sitting in on the multimedia presentation at the time.

qole 2008-09-22 20:25

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 226254)
He was there. I watched him give his part of a presentation. I believe you were sitting in on the multimedia presentation at the time.

You're kidding. Oh well. He didn't have any hardware to show, did he?

And I might have been in the front room chatting with developers, too. It seemed like there was someone there who could answer any of my questions. Not all the same person, of course. But wow.

Off topic a bit here, but...

It was fun to be at c-base, and look at my link-local list of contacts and see the name "rob taylor" show up. "Please wave your hand," I type, and this guy at a nearby table looks around and starts waving. I'm surprised, of course, because he's using an IBM laptop, not the usual Mac laptop that most link local users have. "How come you're on link local?" I ask, and he says, "Oh I'm the guy behind the telepathy suite; I'm running Empathy on my laptop."

I hope the collabora guys get Bonjour / link-local fixed for Diablo. It is very cool.

Benson 2008-09-22 20:37

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dafrabbit (Post 226245)
I'm not quite sure about this...I know on old pen-input touchscreens, special styluses were needed for the screen to register the input...but if it registers touch? Dunno.

What type of touchscreen is on the ITs currently?

Resistive, "normal" touchscreen only; this senses pressure (actually closer to force).

I have an HP tx2000; it has a dual-tech screen with a resistive touchscreen (fingers and plain stylii) and a Wacom digitizer with a passive (but special) stylus. The stylus takes no batteries, but distinguishes tip vs. eraser, has pressure sensitivity, a side button, and moves the cursor around when hovering up to ~0.5" over the screen. (Also, when it's within this range, the computer ignores input from the touchscreen, allowing you to rest your hand on the screen while writing. There's no reason I know why a capacitive multi-touch sensor can't be similarly combined with a digitizer, though I'd bet the digitizer uses substantial power.

I'd really like to see such a dual screen in the N9xx, with the digitizer shut down by a switch in the silo.


As for what multi-touch is good for anyway... finger-tracking!

When you're using one finger (or stylus) on the display, touching it with another finger doesn't have to drag the pointer over to the centroid, but can keep it with the present finger. This could also make two-thumb on-screen keyboarding go a lot faster, as you wouldn't have to guarantee you lift before your other thumb hits. To say nothing of Pyano.

Even if you only use one cursor, and no gestures, a good finger-tracking (and switching, when appropriate) algorithm can make a multi-touch display a lot less glitchy. I'd be thrilled to see this much, although gestures and such are cool, too...

benny1967 2008-09-22 20:46

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
The problem with "cool" things is you get tired of them very quickly (as other things are becoming "cool"). Better stay with technologies that aren't the cool stuff du jour but will remain useful tomorrow.

tso 2008-09-22 20:56

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
thats what i see when i see multi-touch, not those demo friendly gestures, but being able to control multiple things on the screen at the same time. or have a shift key in software.

hell, give me bomberman with multi-touch :D

who needs hardware gamepads ;)

benny1967 2008-09-22 21:04

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 226286)
thats what i see when i see multi-touch, not those demo friendly gestures, but being able to control multiple things on the screen at the same time.

i cant even do this in my brain, why would i want to do it on a screen? ;)

Texrat 2008-09-22 21:05

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by benny1967 (Post 226292)
i cant even do this in my brain, why would i want to do it on a screen? ;)

Ah, you poor souls without ADHD. :D

Jerome 2008-09-22 21:10

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by allnameswereout (Post 226221)
you could start a specific entry called $NAME/Germany.

This is what I did, isn't it?


Quote:

Its a combination of factors, perhaps also a whole new platform (Maemo, Hildon) and the fact Nokia dabbled into this market. The Sharp Zaurus also provided internet connectivity, and ran Linux. One of my beefs with the Zaurus was that the WWW browsing was severely cluttered, so usability might also be an argument for 770.
The Zaurus was also a new platform (QT). The Zaurus had an adequate browser at the times. Opera and even Netfront worked fairly well. Flash was not a big thing at the time.
I still have a few zauruses (zaurii?). The main problem is that they do not support wpa (I know they can with a different wifi card) or bluetooth (and yes: I have an adapter).

Still: I see the 770 as the only successor to the Zaurus. Sharp tried to bring a linux palmtop to the market, and quickly backed out (I had to import the second one from Japan). Nokia started where they left.


Quote:

Oh, don't be sarcastic. Many people don't even read them. They just sign a contract without knowing what they sign. I once had a bank trying to pull me into this trick, and I told them to go **** themselves. And, to give another example: whenever I got hired, I first read the contract.
It's my job to read legal stuff and spot the errors and I like being sarcastic. ;)


Quote:

Its a cat and mouse game which, if telcos want to win, means many people will lose. Ie. ban of cryptographic protocols, or only allow specific protocols.
The masses are losing already. Telcos make their main profits from sms, ringtones and premium services. The telcos are only interested in keeping this situation running. They don't care if 10 linux geeks find a way to run voip as long as the masses keep buying pre-configured branded phones.

You seem to forget that it is a number game. The telcos don't care about anything as long as it is not conveniently packaged in a preconfigured phone. Then they get nasty.

For the future N900, this means that it will not be designed to be a voip over hsdpa only device. Nokia knows how nasty the telcos can be, telcos are their main customers. Of course, it could be that Nokia decides for a frontal attack, but I seriously doubt that. Still: they went for a frontal attack with music sales, so maybe I will be surprised...

Jerome 2008-09-22 21:17

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226233)
My feeling is that when mobile providers, currently still thinking of themselves as mobile phone providers (oh woe to you, you fools) are reduced to ISPs, they will be caught in the same situation that current ISPs are caught in; if you try to restrict protocols or bandwidth, people just go to somewhere else that provides better service.

The mobile ISPs won't be able sell these stupid voice / text / data bundles anymore, because they won't be the only provider of the voice / text services anymore. Anyone will be able to download Skype or some generic SIP client for voice, and Pidgin or some other IM client for text.

What will they be left with?

Well, they can still provide the pipes, and compete in that arena. Woe, woe to them, because that arena is bloody and dangerous, and few emerge unscathed. The shakedown will leave the market a different place.


As I pointed out, the mobile network providers already have taken steps to prevent that from happening.

qole 2008-09-22 21:18

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TA-t3 (Post 226239)
Isn't that using some special-made type of stylus? It would work, but be a bit limiting (right now I use the Palm stylus if the Nokia one isn't in front of me, and sometimes a nail. I actually never uses fingers, as I hate fingerprints on the display.)

There was some humourous talk about this at the summit. Someone suggested that Nokia will release a big finger-shaped-and-sized stylus to use with the multi-touch screen, since they promised to remain stylus-compatible on the software side.

qole 2008-09-22 21:22

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerome (Post 226301)
As I pointed out, the mobile network providers already have taken steps to prevent that from happening.

I think that they may believe that they have, but they haven't. No, really. They haven't. In the current marketplace, they have, but when everyone has tiny linux laptops in their pockets, it will all look silly. Whatever they do, someone will work around it, then publish it for everyone to use. And everyone will use the new workaround. Soon they'll have to give up plugging all the holes in their stupid old-fashioned dike. Seriously.

Just wait. You'll see. Just a bunch of ISPs.

sjgadsby 2008-09-22 21:55

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226265)
He didn't have any hardware to show, did he?

No, if my memory is sound, they showed a photograph of a Beagle Board during that presentation.

Of course, with the quantity of allergy medication I had dumped into my body that day, and the number of times I'd had to use my rescue inhaler, there's a not insignificant chance that during the presentation they actually showed off the next three Maemo devices and the captured alien technology upon which they're based, and I just didn't notice. The summit building was pain for me, and C-Base proper was death. I think I met, face-to-face, a great many nice people and learned a lot of neat things during the summit, but I may well have spent two days chatting with an armchair and a coat rack.

brontide 2008-09-22 22:41

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226207)
There were definite hints (just short of all-out statements) in the Nokia presentations that the next screen will be multitouch and haptic. But, they were hints, and as such, I'm taking them as "we want this as much as you, but there may be technical difficulties so we're not promising anything..."

They said multitouch and haptic were part of the Maemo roadmap, but they were NOT slated for Maemo 5.

qole 2008-09-22 22:42

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
I didn't hear that "not slated for Maemo 5" part. Thanks.

And sjgadsby, you certainly did talk with me, but yes, you did spend a lot of time in deep conversation with the armchair. ;-)

(fun pics by the way)

brontide 2008-09-22 22:47

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226351)
I didn't hear that "not slated for Maemo 5" part. Thanks.

And sjgadsby, you certainly did talk with me, but yes, you did spend a lot of time in deep conversation with the armchair.

I believe ( everything is blurry at this point ) it was in the Desktop by Rodrigo Novo (Nokia) and Matthew Allum (OpenedHand) session. I was distracted with othr items at the time but someone asked if they were confirming multitouch for Fremantle and he asked another Nokia person ( don't know who ) whom confirmed that multitouch was off the table for Maemo 5.

That is my understanding and I could be wrong, but it jibes with what I understood.

allnameswereout 2008-09-22 22:49

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerome (Post 226296)
This is what I did, isn't it?

I meant a seperate page for the Germany entry, but it was just a suggestion to consider. I didn't look into who contributed what and such.

Quote:

The Zaurus was also a new platform (QT). The Zaurus had an adequate browser at the times. Opera and even Netfront worked fairly well. Flash was not a big thing at the time.
I still have a few zauruses (zaurii?). The main problem is that they do not support wpa (I know they can with a different wifi card) or bluetooth (and yes: I have an adapter).
The Zaurus did provide a new platform (Qtopia, later 3rd party ROMs with OPIE, GPE, ...) but the browser was IMO too slow, or not adequate enough. Flash and Java are 2 examples, but also the layout of webpages was often bad in my experience.

Sure, one can run something like pdaXrom, but geez, that is so slow...

It was still revolutionary, at least in my experience, because it was the first mobile Linux platform I ever used.

Compare this to my NIT expeirence. Out of box I was able to surf. Flash worked, layout good, page loaded faster than I was used to.

Does WPA2 still not work with later Linux kernel + CF WiFi cards? This is one advantage of the NIT. It comes with such hardware included. Although the GPS chip leaves much to be desired.

Quote:

Still: I see the 770 as the only successor to the Zaurus. Sharp tried to bring a linux palmtop to the market, and quickly backed out (I had to import the second one from Japan). Nokia started where they left.
Agreed. When I hear a Nokia representative say they invented the tablet/Linux market, I have to giggle. They learned from their predecessors. Got mine from Japan too.

Quote:

It's my job to read legal stuff and spot the errors and I like being sarcastic. ;)
Ah, that explains :)

Quote:

The masses are losing already. Telcos make their main profits from sms, ringtones and premium services.
Yes, but the economy is tightening, and people are also used to IM protocols. I imagine people with tight budgets or cheapskates (read: the Dutch ;)) are interested into this functionality.

At very least one could also combine the NIT with a cheap (open source) telephone for the phoning having a nice Linux system ready for 3G usage.

Oh, and you can use SIP over WiFi at home just like before.

Quote:

The telcos are only interested in keeping this situation running. They don't care if 10 linux geeks find a way to run voip as long as the masses keep buying pre-configured branded phones.
Thing is, the 'N900' is aimed at the general public; not 10 Linux geeks. Its the combination of software, the hardware, and the target audience (and probably many more factors) which has potential. Not only 1 of these.

Quote:

You seem to forget that it is a number game. The telcos don't care about anything as long as it is not conveniently packaged in a preconfigured phone. Then they get nasty.
Usability/integration game, too.

EDIT: T-Mobile 3G FUP (3 GB) PAYG for 2 GBP a day

sjgadsby 2008-09-22 23:23

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brontide (Post 226354)
...someone asked if they were confirming multitouch for Fremantle and he asked another Nokia person ( don't know who ) whom confirmed that multitouch was off the table for Maemo 5.

Something similar happened during the web presentation, though I didn't catch anything about the "no multitouch" answer being for 5 only. It's nice to know it still may appear further down the line.

sjgadsby 2008-09-22 23:29

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226351)
And sjgadsby, you certainly did talk with me, but yes, you did spend a lot of time in deep conversation with the armchair.

Ah, well, you can understand how I might suspect you of being a very well-mannered coat rack.

Texrat 2008-09-22 23:30

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 226325)
I think I met, face-to-face, a great many nice people and learned a lot of neat things during the summit, but I may well have spent two days chatting with an armchair and a coat rack.

Does qole really look like Quentin Tarantino?

qole 2008-09-22 23:47

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
What do you think?

ARJWright 2008-09-22 23:54

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Thanks for the commentary to all that were there. Seriously has been a great read and I wish I were there.

Thinking I'll just apply for a few positions with the Maemo group here in the US, and maybe get to take those ideas and run with em a bit ;)

Apple, Google, and Nokia getting it...man the end is near.

Texrat 2008-09-22 23:57

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226385)
What do you think?

I think I'm skeered.

But I like how Nicolas Cage was gracious enough to get in the third shot.

brontide 2008-09-23 00:04

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 226392)
I think I'm skeered.

But I like how Nicolas Cage was gracious enough to get in the third shot.

I would like to thank Nicholas Cage for his work on MicroB

GeneralAntilles 2008-09-23 00:05

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 226392)
But I like how Nicolas Cage was gracious enough to get in the third shot.

Ahahah . . . poor timeless. . . .

Texrat 2008-09-23 00:20

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brontide (Post 226399)
I would like to thank Nicholas Cage for his work on MicroB

Hey, he had Billy Bob Thornton's full attention.

qole 2008-09-23 00:22

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Texrat: ...You haven't commented on Baloo, Handful, or rm_you yet in that picture.

And "skeered"?! What the... ?! I have no idea what that means. Can we make a rule about you and fake accents?

Texrat 2008-09-23 00:24

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226407)
And "skeered"?! What the... ?! I have no idea what that means. Can we make a rule about you and fake accents?

Only if we can make a rule about you and juvenile internet memes.

EDIT: that came out coarser than intended... but if I made it longer and more politically correct then it would lose all parallelism with your line, which would throw the universe out of kilter, and End All Life As We Know It.

I'm gonna have to leave it. :p

Jerome 2008-09-23 06:17

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by allnameswereout (Post 226355)
Yes, but the economy is tightening, and people are also used to IM protocols. I imagine people with tight budgets or cheapskates (read: the Dutch ;)) are interested into this functionality.

Frankly, I wonder what the motives really are for most people. It seems that everyone has gone mental about reducing their phone bills. I see people with a very comfortable salary who will go out of their way, spend time and effort, risk losing their number and the capacity to phone for weeks, tie themselves to long (typically 2 years) unchangeable contracts for saving, maybe, 5 or 10 Euros a month. Sorry, but I don't get it.

And the quality of service can be abysmal too, which is not due to voip but to the voip providers. Maybe I'll give some examples:

-about 2 years ago, I travelled to New Zealand. I can't go further away from home (Europe) while staying on this planet. Because I had a tablet, and long distance calls can be expensive, especially from hotels (although there are calling cards with quite reasonable rates), I arranged a sip adapter at home and installed gizmo on the tablet. From voip to voip the connection was cristal clear (and free) from Dubai, Singapore, Australia and NewZealand.

-since I put 10$ on that gizmo (sipphone) account, I have tried to use it to call regular phone. I still have over 9$ on the account. The quality when I call phones in Europe is so bad that I can't use it. It's obviously sipphone fault: the connection from their networks to the pots in Europe sucks.

-this year I opened another account with sipgate, because they give me a german phone number for free. Same story here: quality is fair when I call to Germany, abysmal when I call to France.

So I wonder. Are people really content with poor quality calls? Do people, in general, phone so much that the savings are substancial? A friends daughter spends her life with her cell phone. Even in that case the savings would barely be worth it.

It is a behaviour which defies logic. Besides, most people save pennies on their calls, but are fools for anything else. They spend 2-3€ per ringtone which they change every week while it is quite easy to use any free mp3 as ringtone. They fall for 2 years contracts because they want to buy the "latest" phone for free. They use premium sms at 2€ for 140 bytes. They send mms pictures when in vacation at 5€ the mms, etc...

I don't get it. I could, with a stretch of my imagination, understand why it is important, for many people, to be seen with the latest iPhone whatever the price is (for example). I don't get it when, at the same time, their motivation to have it jailbreaked is to use voip.

That, and fake Rolex or Vuitton bags, I don't get. Sorry.


Quote:

Originally Posted by allnameswereout (Post 226355)
Thing is, the 'N900' is aimed at the general public; not 10 Linux geeks. Its the combination of software, the hardware, and the target audience (and probably many more factors) which has potential. Not only 1 of these.

The future N900 may be aimed at the general public. Probably. Nokia needs an iPhone competitor. I am not disputing that.

What I doubt (but I don't see the future) are:
-that a voip enabled cellphone would disrupt the market. My e51 can use voip over hsdpa out of the box, BTW.
-that this is Nokia's idea for the N900. Telcos are Nokia's main customers. I don't see Nokia directly aiming at their business.

Besides, telcos have an ace up their sleeve: they can always lower call rates to voip levels. I explained why this technically a better solution for them. I can also say that they can afford it: call charges make only a fraction of their business nowaday (less than half in Germany). Of course this may not be sufficient, since the customers are not rational in their choice and strongly believe that voip is "free" while cell rates are "expensive" whatever the price actually is.

ragnar 2008-09-23 06:48

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 226371)
Something similar happened during the web presentation, though I didn't catch anything about the "no multitouch" answer being for 5 only. It's nice to know it still may appear further down the line.

Yes, multitouch is certainly on the table of considerations, it's a part of the touch UI equation. But nothing has been currently announced. :)

luca 2008-09-23 06:53

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
For me it would be enough to have single touch actually working, and not registering multiple clicks with a single tap.
Oh, and a device that doesn't break after a year of mild use...

benny1967 2008-09-23 07:30

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by luca (Post 226478)
For me it would be enough to have single touch actually working, and not registering multiple clicks with a single tap

Oh yes. *sigh*

When typing on the vkb, i haave a lott mmore multiittouch thann I''d eeverr waant.

tso 2008-09-23 10:46

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
bah, upgrade to diablo already...

luca 2008-09-23 11:00

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 226504)
bah, upgrade to diablo already...

...where I still have the same problem (edit: nevermind though, since my n800 is dying it won't be a problem any longer)

benny1967 2008-09-23 11:08

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 226504)
bah, upgrade to diablo already...

i did when diablo was available.

double-clicks seem tto get woorse

fpp 2008-09-23 11:10

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 226325)
No, if my memory is sound, they showed a photograph of a Beagle Board during that presentation.

I believe one of the afternoon presentations (I think it was "multimedia" on Friday, track 2) featured an actual board that was meant to be used in a demo. We only really got to see it waved around though, as it seems they did not have the right VGA connector to hook it up with the room projector :-)

Jaffa 2008-09-23 13:42

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by brontide (Post 224992)
The DevSesh this morning was really pushing... all data all the time via HSPA so you should design your applications based on that. While the conic stuff will still be there there is already a push for data rich ( broadband speeds ) applications.

If this results in app authors not using caching, or forgetting about an "offline" mode, they'll get a slap for reasons I outlined ages ago. Primarily:
  1. Data is expensive, or has usage limits.
  2. HSPA coverage is patchy at best.
  3. Planes are offline zones.

Jaffa 2008-09-23 13:48

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 226265)
I hope the collabora guys get Bonjour / link-local fixed for Diablo. It is very cool.

Indeed. I chatted to brontide a little before leaving using Bonjour in Pidgin in Ubuntu. A breeze to setup; would've liked to have it on the tablet as well.

Will have another look to see if it works after a clean reflash in the next couple of days.

SD69 2008-09-23 14:24

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerome (Post 226474)

The future N900 may be aimed at the general public. Probably. Nokia needs an iPhone competitor. I am not disputing that.

What I doubt (but I don't see the future) are:
-that a voip enabled cellphone would disrupt the market. My e51 can use voip over hsdpa out of the box, BTW.
-that this is Nokia's idea for the N900. Telcos are Nokia's main customers. I don't see Nokia directly aiming at their business.

Besides, telcos have an ace up their sleeve: they can always lower call rates to voip levels. I explained why this technically a better solution for them. I can also say that they can afford it: call charges make only a fraction of their business nowaday (less than half in Germany). Of course this may not be sufficient, since the customers are not rational in their choice and strongly believe that voip is "free" while cell rates are "expensive" whatever the price actually is.

I can say first hand that Nokia had VoIP in mind when developing the 770. Nokia is not directly aiming at the telco business; they are doing an end around.

Nyrath 2008-09-23 14:34

Re: Dr. Ari Jaaksi on Maemo 5
 
There is a nice overview of Maemo 5 here:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...tablet-os.html


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8