![]() |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
as stated before, the only reason I occassionally ask the question about updating kernel is to see if their is a way to simplify the process a bit. Some of the 3.x series kernels (3.2 iirc) receive longterm support so trying to rebase around them would bring a kernel with fixes coming from wider community, rather than just you guys having to find and backport them.
for this to actually be worth the effort though would require all drivers etc to be mainlined/centralised? so the devs here, sailfish, debian etc can all contribute to the same codebase. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Hi, is it possible to keep the phone charging for several days?
I charged my phone with bqCharger but after 2 days of charging the battery was empty, even tough it was plugged in all the time. I was hoping, that it would continue loading automatically, but somehow charging stopped and did not continue again. Is that normal? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right thread, as the question above anyway but it remembers me that it could be nice to have a way to charge the phone slowly during the night as that is the best way to charge any battery. Is this something that the kernel controls or does it need a special charger that delivers only the exact amount of Amps/h to achieve this. A nice way to do this would be to use the alarm on the phone to know when it needs to finish charging and adjust the current in function of the amount of hours it can charge. Even easier would be for the phone to ask how long it can charge as soon as it is connected to a charger. Just a thought I had in mind for a long time and never let out. Done. ;-) |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
This... is one of the... strangest and at least for me unreasonable (in terms of effort for very small gains) requests. I get the bit about slow-charging, but Häh? Couldn't you just plug it into an USB port without activating USM? Wouldn't that be slow enough over the night?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Turn wifi, gps, bluetooth and lights on...and then charge it :D
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
:D Still these are two nice workarounds for my problem: The later, the battery is fully charged, the later it starts discharging :-) It won't run 24/7 unattended but at least for a few days.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
So you can't install kernel-power when you have "kernel-modules-maemo, kernel-maemo"?
"Conflict with kernels" it says =( me so n00b :( |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Please try to give the full error message.
Either append the log from the problems page of HildonApplicationManager or copy and paste the output of apt-get from X-Terminal application |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
The regular application manager says "Can't install Linux kernel for power user"
Reason: " Conflict with software package: kernel-modules-maemo kernel-maemo kernel-modules-maemo kernel-maemo" Never found any "hildon" just a "Maemo.org Based Hildon Theme" |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
dist-upgrade In addition to performing the function of upgrade, this option also intelligently handles changing dependencies with new versions of packages; apt-get has a "smart" conflict resolution system, and it will attempt to upgrade the most important packages at the expense of less important ones, if necessary.Try to rename ("mv") the log. When you reflash, you remove these logs and start all over. "apt-get dist-upgrade" may also clean packages that have been uninstalled from the logs. I have done it twice with success. The installation logs become huge, you have a track of everything and nobody here has ever mentioned these logs, few know that you can trace every installation. This is not MS-DOS or Windows. Use "Storage User", look at /home.apt-archive-cache - ant files here can be deleted - "rm" (removed). I hope this helps. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Is there still a FM radio driver issue in KP51?
I just broke out FMradio for the first time in over a year and got the "cannot load fm radio driver module" error Older forum posts pointed to a KP48 issue, is this still an issue or should I look elsewhere? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
@biketool: on my n900 fm radio working fine.
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=64379 96372.302124] hci_h4p hci_h4p: firmware: requesting bcmfw.bin [96372.654357] radio_bcm2048: disagrees about version of symbol struct_module He solved his issue by uninstalling and reinstalling KP, but I would rather not try reinstalling KP with CSSU-thumb because AFAIK that pretty much means reflash, especially dont want to now with the repos down, any ideas? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Just reinstall kernel-power - it seems that due to corruption or some other issue a certain module's getting loaded wrong.
(Note: BCM2048 is the bluetooth module, and should have nothing to do with FM radio.) |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Whoops, sorry about that. It seems that I forgot the message in the FM Radio app that tells you the Bluetooth module is turned on.
I guess I confused it for the Si4713 FMTX chip. In any case, a fresh reinstall of the kernel and modules should do it. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
$ sudo apt-get --reinstall install kernel-power-modules above didnt fix it either (update) The above DID fix it, forgot how hit or miss FMradio is, QRadio fired right up! |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
I'm having problems to update kp51.
It seems there is some problem downloading some packages. Sorry if that has been written but i have been away. regards |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
A question:
If I remove the battery long enough for the phone to lose the time, aka you have to set the time next time you boot it up. When you do this, isnt the battery calibration supposed to remain. This happend me to today. For quite some time (months) I did a calibration of the battery with the new batterymodules included in Kernel-Power. And from time to time I reboot my phone or just remove the battery, but it back in and start the phone again, since I find my phone quite slow after a few days uptime. And when the phone is up and running again, the battery calibration have been the same when I load the battery modules. But today I removed the battery and didnt put the battery back in the phone for like 30 seconds. And to my surprise the battery modules have no knowledge of the capacity of the battery anymore, it just says 0mh. Have something gone wrong here that isnt supposed to happen or is like this? Just wondering, cos calibrating the battery is a quite long process. And I want to avoid doing that. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
For some reason, Pali decided, that bq27x00_battery doesn't export some (full charge, current charge) *at all*, when "need calibration" (more than 32 cycles since last calibration, or never calibrated) flag is present - no matter if calibration data were lost, or not.
It's very irritating, to be honest, as every 32 charging cycles you need to re-calibrate battery, as you get 0/0 mAh readings from battery applet (despite fact, that bq27x00 hardware still have pretty correct calibration data). --- Sticking more precisely to your question, removing battery for too long + having "clock battery" dead (itms the case for 90% of devices), may result in bq27x00 losing calibration data + setting flag "need calibration" to 1. /Estel |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
running kp v52.
Status menu applet shows phone only charging to 74-75% (950mAh) but battery capacity is shown to be 1300mAh. while on concky capacity is shown to reach 100%. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
About shutting down device with kp52 and bme replacement bits, from today's IRC:
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
when the kp52 is gonna officially release?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
see first post: when somebody fix extras-devel
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
I have installed kp2.6.28.10v51r1 and then installed kp2.6.28.10cssu3.
how can I install the kpv52? gives a message of incompatible version.:o |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Installed KP52 today and gave a restart but after that my phone gives Guru Mediation error. Tried twice but still no luck. What im doing wrong?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Instead of Developing Something else on KP, i guess much developement needed on DSP, iam sorry im noob but this is really needed. And It'd be better if we could run n9's kernel on n900, i knw thats funny ****, but i dunno its possible or no
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
no. ten chars
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
Thanks to Jolla, Nemo and Mer there might be a replacement kernel for the N9 in the future but you have got to thank Pali for his amazing work which every N9 can only dream to have... He pushes out updates to improve stuff while the N9 is using a kernel that if the replacement project doesn't work out well has nobody else looking to improve it... |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
it's faster:) |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
linux kernel is under GPLv2 license, so you can redistribute it under GPLv2 without any problem.
But I do not understand what is faster and why you want to do... You can only disorient users which tryting to find *last* kp52. |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Hi, I have a problem I can not install kernel-power-modules_2.6.28-10power52_armel.deb because it gives me message "You can not install kernel power modules incompatible application package"
What's going on? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
What is that *it*?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Kernel-power-bootimage v52 is wrongly packed:
it doesn't provide item file for multiboot it puts image on opt and symlinks (opt is inaccessible on boot) cssu-thumb users may be supprised if updating to kp52 (kp51 gone kp52 not bootable and failsafe maemo kernel doesn't have thumb support) |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Can't confirm. On my device with thumb *and" multiboot, update from kp51r1 went smoothly, image was where it should etc. Can't remember about item file, as I do them by hand, anyway.
/Estel |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
And where can I download the kernel power v.51?
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Quote:
|
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
Sorry if this was discussed, but after I just installed kernel-power v51, I noticed the phone doesn't react on keys or incoming calls/SMS if the processor is fully used by some process (I tried "tar -cvf /home/user/MyDocs/mmc1.tar /media/mmc1/", /media/mmc1 is a 32Gb ext2 partition, if that matters). Just after finishing creating the archive the phone unfreezed and received the SMS, which was sent during archiving. The stock kernel was more desktop friendly (kernel timer frequency too low?).
Edit: overall usability performance seems to be slower... No? |
Re: [Announce] kernel-power stable v51 in Extras-Devel
I'm not entirely sure what do you mean by creating tar of microSD content (32GB, as you've said) and where you expect to save such big file (because it is what that command you've mentioned mean).
Nevertheless, problems like this seem to be related to swap problems - try using swap on microSD *only* and search for optimizations related to way swap is used (posted somewhere in easy debian, for example). --- Otherwise, kernel on it's own doesn't change your frequencies, especially into lower ranges ;) /Estel |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:54. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8