![]() |
Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
No surprises really.. microb is a bit sluggish.
But where is the bottleneck? http://www.pocketables.net/2008/10/website-load-ti.html |
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
It's a lame comparison. Says lots about the hardware and practically nothing about the software. The Archos 5 has got a Cortex A8 at 600MHz (versus our ARM11 @ 400MHz) which is easily 2-3x faster. The iPhone, too, has a faster processor (ARM11 @ ~500MHz).
This will be an interesting comparison when all 3 browsers are compared on the same hardware, until then, it's just a hardware comparison. Oh, also, please search first. |
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Really, I don't know WHY people make comparisons like this. Page load times are ******ed benchmarks. Yeah, the Archos loads pages faster (and as the General says, the processor is 2-3x faster), but people say the scrolling is crap compared to the iPhone. Its really stupid to compare a brand new device to a old one. Yes, even though the internet tablet is not that old, the mobile market is moving FAST. Its like comparing a Pentium 4 running Vista to a Dual Core running Xubuntu. Its obvious which is faster, why bother. Actually, its amazing the the iPhone and the Tablet are so close to the much more powerful Archos.
|
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Why not make comparisons like this? People are buying products, not the CPU. It is not like they can say "I want a Nokia N810, but with a faster processor, please."
The comparison, as seen from a different stand point than "rollover and take whatever CPU they give you and then defend it" is what any real consumer will look at first. I didn't buy my N810 for the CPU. I didn't buy my 770 for its CPU. I bought them for their functionality which is tied into their perceived performance. I know, I know... the N810 isn't a primetime, mainstream piece of tech. So you people (look above) will invariably know it's a OMAP XX and it's at XXX mhz, and it's capable of YY and you like it because of ZZ. But you do not, I repeat... do not represent the average consumer in the least. You guys (here) are way too damn informed to be considered the average consumer; even on your worst day. This comparison, from the average consumer standpoint... it's "valid". And says to me that performance N810 might need to be optimized a bit as far as my browser is concerned. |
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
i am so selling my n810. I dont see any reasons to keep it. can someone tell me which way is n810 better than both those products?
|
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Quote:
|
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Well, so what? That's a link to an average consumer site.
Just because this tiny portion of the internet space allows you to think that your statements carry weight; you're not the target audience of the site where this originated. Per usual, you've somehow overlooked that. Simply stated; live with it. You are just a smaller part of a bigger puzzle. Consumers are a bigger reason why better products will continue to come out after you've attached your feelings to one platform/CPU/(insert whatever) like some remora fish. And all it takes - dear non-consumer type - is just to hear that something is faster than another thing. Consumers will flock to it. Supply, demand... features. Something some people learn very early in life. |
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Quote:
its a good thing liqbase is targeted specifically at the maemo platform then isn't it ;) |
Re: Archos iPhone n810 web load time comparison
Quote:
Pertaining General Attitude, he'll be ok. Rolleyes and sweeping statements; rather egocentric. It's just sad. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:11. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8