![]() |
N97 < n900
If you went to USA Nokia official website, on the home page, you would see the price of N900 equals N97's price.
By taking a look at the hardware camparison, I see n900 is much better/stronger than N97 (everywhere). Why Nokia gives them the same price? i think n900 should be higher than 97....... it's not fair |
Re: N97 < n900
Quote:
|
Re: N97 < n900
n97 based on Symbian
|
Re: N97 < n900
n900 based on meego
|
Re: N97 < n900
Quote:
|
Re: N97 < n900
having had both, they are two different kettle of fish entirely, however given the hardware in the n97, I would hate to be the Nokia Salesperson convincing me to buy the 3 year old 400mhz processor, 128mb ram POS when i tell him i need it to be responsive when multitasking, over the phone which has a f^&$ing gig of ram in it!
I will say that in the 4 months i had the n97, by month 3, it has started to grow on me- sure multitasking was never an option, but it has some pretty decent capabilities to it. email grabbing was quick, there were a few cool apps(the torrent client being my favourite), but when my shiny new n900 came in the mail last week, and after 5 minutes it was like the n97 had just been madeline mckain'd then ways from sunday. |
Re: N97 < n900
Quote:
|
Re: N97 < n900
Quote:
|
Re: N97 < n900
Quote:
A similar situation would be PC World selling you a PC with "8GB of memory", when 4GB of it is swap space. (Technically 'application memory' because your system allocates it to applications.) |
Re: N97 < n900
Not everything is hardware. There are many features the N97 has that the N900 lacks.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:11. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8