maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   General (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=20250)

OSEmuTech 2008-05-20 03:38

Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
This is like andLinux, but apparently better. :)

Fresh on Slashdot.org and already /.-ed. I got there eventually. The Virtual Desktop executable is 503 MB.

A Virtualized Linux System For Windows

Ulteo today unveiled their Virtual Desktop (screenshots, download) which is a free, full Linux desktop that runs seamlessly on Windows. It's interesting because it's not running under Xen or VMWare, but instead uses the coLinux patch, which they claim allows the system to achieve 'great performance, close to a native installation on the PC.' No need to reboot the system anymore to switch from Windows to Linux.

We discussed Ulteo when the Ubuntu-derived distro was announced a year back.

Pretty damn cool! :D


I had to sign up for a free ulteo account. Now to setup Scratchbox ...

Bundyo 2008-05-20 04:32

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
What exactly is better with this one? I don't see anything that can force me to change. I can use Anjuta 2.4 on andLinux, which is a plus to me :)

OSEmuTech 2008-05-20 16:37

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
For one thing, you can easily launch and end the Ulteo Virtual Desktop (UVD). And instead of a few icons in the systray menu of andLinux (KWrite, Kate, etc.), UVD uses a Kicker bar with a ton of Linux software (OpenOffice, Gimp, etc.).

I'm new to using UVD, so I'll have to explore it some more for benefits and bugs. Synaptic doesn't seem to be installed by default and apt-get update isn't grabbing anything, so I'll have to manually add some repositories. But the Ulteo forum is /.-ed, so I'll have to wait to find assistance.

fms 2008-05-20 16:56

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
These guys took coLinux (www.colinux.org) and repackaged it as their own "product". Open source at its finest, yes...

Bundyo 2008-05-20 17:02

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
That looks like a customized XFCE bar more, but i won't be installing this to check :)

What's so hard in running andLinux? Unless you didn't install it as a service...

OSEmuTech 2008-05-20 17:26

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Nothing is wrong with andLinux. And I've been using coLinux for years to run numerous distros (to run the Linux port of the SheepShaver emulator before there was a Windows port).

Ulteo is yet another way of packaging Ubuntu with coLinux. I think Ulteo has more to offer the user new to Linux. The kicker panel gives the user access to many programs and configurations. Once I get around* to seeing how to install/remove software, if the panel reflects the changes, that would be a big plus vs. the andLinux systray.

*My new N800 just arrived!

ysss 2008-05-20 18:08

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Can this be 'installed' to a USB stick (a la U3 apps or PortableApps) to have the apps run cross platform on Windows and Linux?

OSEmuTech 2008-05-20 18:28

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
No. This requires installing a number of items like the Tap-Win32 network driver to serve as a conduit for the colinux XServer (for graphics and sound).

However, programs created on andLinux/UlteoVD can be ran on standard Linux (or Maemo thanks to Scratchbox) systems, sometimes from a mountable drive.

ysss 2008-05-20 18:46

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Oh ok.
Though I don't quite see the point of running Linux version of OO.o and Firefox on a windows system, as in the demo picture.

hfw01 2008-06-04 14:14

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
I've been running andLinux, and youo can run the kicker bar if you prefer it. Just launch it from a terminal. That's how I get it when I want it. I even have it set to autohide, and to take up about 1/4 of the screen instead of the whole screen.

-hal

xer0kill 2008-06-04 15:05

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
What is this "Windows" you speak of, and why has it imprisoned Linux?

Benson 2008-06-04 20:43

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
These Windows have iron bars...

hfw01 2008-06-06 04:37

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Unfortunately these windows things have apps that I have to run at work. Vmware may be neat stuff, but it is just easier to live in windows at work.

Luckily windows only has to live on my work laptop. My home machine is Linux...

-hal

anyonebutthis 2012-03-14 18:11

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Too bad it uses CoLinux. This means it's limited to running inside a 32-bit OS.

don_falcone 2012-03-14 18:15

Re: Ulteo Virtual Desktop - Better than andLinux
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by anyonebutthis (Post 1179467)
Too bad it uses CoLinux. This means it's limited to running inside a 32-bit OS.

_This_, and using VT extensions the performance is usually good enough within VirtualBox. Seamless mode = good too.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:44.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8