![]() |
Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Well, as discussed before, Nokia will be issuing a netbook. But as Architengi incisively asks,
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Yes. Yes. Yes.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
Not to mention there aren't many phones out there that can do what I want it to do easily. The iPhone requires hacking (only to have said hacks erased with an Apple update). Android (it's getting there). Though both need slightly bigger screens. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
I keep hearing "it's better than you think" or something as vague, but nothing exact. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Not the first. The Archos5 has the same resolution, same with some Sony phone. In fact, I believe the new sidekick has a higher res screen! And screen resolution is nothing compared to usability and apps. So unless this is running Symbian or WinMo or Android, why bother.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
I think Apple did the right thing when disallowing multitasking for 3rd party apps. Although not having multitasking sucks. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Yes, the elusive sofabook... although that does not necessarily mean pocketable (7" is a good sofabook size, too). But if you DO want to make it pocketable, that's a ~4-5" depending on bezel right there.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
Realistically: swapping out spare batteries almost invariably requires a shutdown, and charging from a USB pack is too slow, and can be awkward to leave connected while device and battery pack are in pockets/holsters. But if you can get around those, the total-energy advantage is significant. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
All cellphones are designed with the dual assumption that battery replenishment is by charging, never changing, and that state is trivial (so rebooting is no problem). The latter is revealed in the awkward compromises of putting SIM slots, microSD slots, and even data cable contacts behind the battery. Together, these make adding a backup power system doubly pointless, and even though Maemo devices to date seem to have ducked the second, the first seems firmly in place. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
The NIT as predicated has the same screen as that cellphone. Me, I agree with you. I'm not making any of those decisions, however. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
According to this old report over 300,000 upto and including the n800 which really supprised me.
Tablet Sales |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
that rumored NIT ain't a NIT, it's a maemo cellphone. |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Quote:
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Since the toshiba resolution is easily divided by 3, I think they are talking sub pixels. Ie each red green and blue dot are counted as a pixel. In honest people talk, this would give it a resolution of 320x480. nothing special.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
I was just wondering about those resolution numbers, myself. That's an awfully small screen to have 960x480 pixels on it. If those numbers are true, it has 20% more horizontal resolution than the Maemo devices... talk about dense dpi...
EDIT: "Toshiba Biblio e-reader handled, deemed extremely small" ... that's 960x480? Really? |
Re: Losing the best-res title
Unless they use non-square pixels, it can't be 320x480 (that's 3:2 aspect ratio, which the device clearly isn't). 480x960 is in line with the display's proportions. Here's a closeup of the screen, the resolution seems fairly smooth, 2:1 aspect ratio, no sign of discoloration caused by subpixel rendering. While the picture is not perfectly in focus so I cannot judge the exact resolution it certainly seems more to me than triple-up math.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Yes, and this pic seems to suggest that the resolution is pretty high, too.
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Guess number 2. Its a grayscale display. from looking at the provided pictures, it appears to be grayscale. Maybe its e-ink . The included article compares it to the kindle
|
Re: Losing the best-res title
Can't be, walks like a TFT, quacks like a TFT (backlight, color of turned off display)... Also, the image qole linked to clearly shows color.
But, why stop at the biblio, the crafty Japanese also made the Fujitsu F03A which packs the same resolution into 3.2". Or the Sharp 931SH with a brutal 1024x480 / 3.8" screen. I don't know who manufactures the eye-implants required to see all the pixels on these babies... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:22. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8