![]() |
N900 Web Browser`
Has anyone with access to a N900 tried to complete the ACID3 test, and if not would anyone be able to run the test and see how it compares to a webkit browser, if a webkit browser can eve run the test. opera mobile on my phone threw 4 exceptions, and halted the test after 0.87s. Would you mind posting a video comparison, hopefully someone can clue me in. I like this computer but want a way to analyze the differences b.w the sony xperia x10 and the n900.
as far as everyone saying its a complete and competent browser, i would just like to see how it holds up against real desktop browsers, and webkit. thanks a lot!!! ps: first post "HEY EVERYONE!!!" been reading about the N900 for a while but havent seen the tests run outside of independent battery issues, at least on this forum, PLUS im done with unboxing videos on youtube in 10 different languages, we need something substantive now that the device is out. |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
Well it counts up to 94/100 on the browser on 3g - my laptop goes to 93 on wireless ?! lol So no idea what that means.... |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
http://acid3.acidtests.org/ ...on a second thought: http://www.google.com/ |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
Why is everyone on here getting ridiculous - second post tonight where someone posts a google link to be funny.... wouldn't have minded if you had actually been useful and cocky at the same time.... You could have been slightly more useful by doing the tests yourself, maybe explaining the Acid tests to the rest of the world who don't understand it? |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
The acid tests try out different browsers for functionality and standards compliance. Acid3 is the latest and greatest. And firefox 3.5 gets 93/100. Few browsers get 100 (i think chrome does)
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
ooo intruiging, mine does say 94? - random :) - but the laptop is ff3.5 - so that makes sense :) |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
I had to try it though, as people seem to think WebKit is the holy grail of HTML rendering but in my experience, its usually much worse than Gecko although faster. Its hardly rocket science to do things faster by doing them wrong though. Eeeek, iPod Touch Safari reaches 100. That said it clearly says the animation should be smooth and its not, it stalls several times. But then I haven't seen it run on anything and NOT stall at least twice, so I find the test rather dubious. |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
My laptop (Thinkpad / wi-fi / Win 7 / ie 8) craps out at 12!!!
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
Thanks for the results of the test by the way. |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
opera gets 100/100 :>
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
Is that the newest version of opera? |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
I'd have thought thought the world's most popular browser would have scored better, though... |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
1 Attachment(s)
I got a score of 94/100. Posted from the N900 browser
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Mobile Firefox also makes it up to 94, which isn't too surprising since it's just another Gecko browser.
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
hey guys, wow thanks for the responses, and thats not as great as i thought it would do, i think the droid gets a 94 as well i tested in a store this evening, and that was the first thing i tried out.
its good to know that its at least as good as FF on a desktop, and what ive seen online a few videos is promising, i like the device, thanks for the analysis guys appreciate it! |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
I do not think this test is the holy grail of tests people think it is. It proves it correctly supports a certain list of functionality, but does it prove you can actually use that functionality several times on a page without the browser falling over? I don't think it does.
So like many benchmarks, it gives you a good base but goes nowhere to prove its actually usable in the real world. |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
Heck, most people don't even know what a browser is. |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Sorry i know nothing about internet on mobile phones, will i be able to listen to live footballl through the internet? also would i be able to watch live football from the internet through the phone? if yes how much mb would it take to watch or listen to a game?
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
I can listen happilly to radio 5 live :) - works fine for me. I can watch youtube footy clips, and also listen to podcasts (including sports ones)... What it struggles with is the live tv / larger streamers such as iplayer. Sound is ok, but video is unwatchable. WIth regards to data - it really depends on what you are watching - hence more specific. If you have any test websites, i can try them for you :) |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Quote:
|
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Now kids, remember that the acid test isn't exactly a measuring line - it's more a test of the browser's ability to jumps through some (pretty arbitrary) hoops. Of course, a big score is nice, but somewhere above 90 is pretty good enough. As for IE, i'm not surprised, those people don't care about any standards anyway. They're proud their latest IE8 is able to get 32!
@squirreluk, most streams should work, as long as they're a common enough format, not some exotic stuff. How much traffic you use up by doing this depends on what quality the stream has and how it's compressed. But if you can find wi-fi, it's free! |
Re: N900 Web Browser`
Actually IE8 is getting 20. IE9's early tech preview is getting 32.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:08. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8