|
camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
4 Attachment(s)
hello guys,yesterday i was working with one girl and she had also an n900 so i was installing for her some software and i saw that she still had the pr 1.1 so I opened her camera to see how it was working and I noticed the huge difference btw mine end her . .how"s it possible I bought mine 5 months ago in NY and she bought her in HK few months ago but it's still with pr 1.1
here some photo so you can judge it . . |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
WTF ! are u sure the settings are okay and similer in both ?
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
yes I'm :-(
I checked more then one time and the funny thing is that she still has pr 1.1 and her camera it's 300 times better then mine |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Try shooting that same thing with the Battery Cover off and see if it improves.
They both Suck to me by the way... |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Did you use flash? If so this has been discussed before, I think there is a problem with the N900 flash being reflected back into the lens. Mine seems to suffer from similar issues.
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
You prolly have sushi on your devices lens, try cleaning it.
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
HA |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
@ andrew_85:
I can sympathize with you. My camera is positively cr@p too. Especially when using the widescreen mode. My old N95-8GB absolutely pans it in image quality. I've actually been thinking of taking it in to the Nokia service centre to get it checked out. |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
I wonder about all the N900 complaints sometimes and then I see shots like this and I get it. My camera takes pictures closer to the last shot there but arguably better. There is probably a lot of faulty devices out there.
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
my n900 camera sucks in low light. it has a white haze and pour contrast, worse than you first to photos. in bright light i the camera is good.
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
please can you also test the front camera. I've heard they vary with hardware revisions perhaps it's the same with the back.
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
The back on pr 1.1.1 (may be) good, after Pr.1.2 update not very |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Damn, that's some outrageously LARGE dildo on the table............. o.O
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
I've also noticed the quality of photos dramatically reduced since installing/reflashing PR1.2. When I first got the device, I took some amazing shots of the Forth Road Bridges with great clarity and vibrant colours. Now everything seems to be shot from behind a veil. I played around with some of the settings like exposure, resolution etc, but nothing seems to get it back to the quality it once was :(
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
hm, i've just tested mine setting the flash to always on and taking a pic of somthing black and it does get the white haze, i tried doing it without the back cover but it kept triggering the dashboard (i use shortcutd) if necessary i'll go disable it, but i don't think it will matter, there is no cover over the camera (with the lens cover open), it's a hole, nothing to reflect the flash there
edit: taking a pic of a indoor scene with white walls and other colored objects still has the white haze, so it wasn't just the black thing reflecting the flash |
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
Re: camera difference btw 2 n900!!mine sucks!
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:58. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8