![]() |
2ghz phone by end of 2010
Motorola is planning to release a ghz phone by end of 2010 to beat apple. Google it people. You may have to say bye to the n9 or whatever nokia is gonna release before it actually is released. Cant believe they are going that far to beat apple. They are gonna lose anyway, not to iphone to IOS
|
Re: 2ghz hone by end of 2010
^ missing the point here?
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
sources......... relevance............. ????????
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
here you go. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Errr... This is a Maemo forum. Maybe you posted here by mistake...
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
"It's not what you have, its how you use it". Doubly so in the case of a mobile phone or computer.
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
This belongs in Competitors.
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
My 1.8 GHz core 2 duo can run circles around my pentium 3 GHz. Frequency has not mattered since a long time - and it matters even less in the mobile playing field. Every successive processor technology brings with it another facet of performance improvements that makes it difficult to compare against previous generations. And then there is the matter of the software and its open-ness. So take your FUD to some place where people are likely to be affected. Oh wait. That's what t.m.o. is for. As you were... |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
only thing motorola is doing now is trying to get a rid from phones division and set it adrift into the ocean.
and btw the ghz train went already after people have realized that gpus and multiple cores can do some serious crunching when instructed properly. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
I cant imagine how hot that phone is gonna get :P
Heat sinks? What about battery? No matter how powerful a phone get but in my opinion the mobile battery technology isnt going anywhere..\\ I hope its a well thought move.. or it may burn down the company |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
Quote:
If this is a 2ghz chip it may only run at 1.5 depending on what battery life & temperature specs they are targeting. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
Regarding OS: Android is much better than iOS by the simple fact that it is based off Linux, but even thats not good enough for my phone. I like it, but I prefer Maemo/Meego over Android. About a week into playing with my wife's HTC G2, I realized that I really preferred my n900 over Android. Why? Because for everything I needed, there was a Linux app. The desktop Linux community is much more active and productive and stable than Android can hope to be, and the n900 gets much of its great capabilities as a side effect of the desktop Linux world being what it is. For those things that there wasn't a Linux app, there was someone who was willing to make it - which benefits maemo as well as Linux - and thus there is more motivation to do it. tl;dr: Frequency is irrelevant, Linux rules, n900 is the best. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
sounds to me its more like a dual core chip at 1ghz = "2"ghz to the misnomer.. which is what the Cortex A9 will be..
If we keep waiting for these around the corner technologies, we can wait forever since the quad core ARM is most likely in the works with 2ghz of clocking (total 8ghz?) really irrelevant until something is actually out and substantial |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
exactly, 2ghz doesn't mean NUTS if it isn't optimized. i can have a phone running at 1ghz and a silky smooth user experience, better battery life, etc.
that i think is more important ultimately. the mobile device world is a bit different from a PC since resources (including powersupply) are scarce. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Motorola + 2Ghz + phone = not gonna happen 2010 (and probably 2011)
Motorola are not leaders, they're ambitious followers. They're Milestone2 with OMAP3xxx clocked at 1.2GHz means nothing when its running Android. Google really needs to polish their source and make it easy for OEM's to set up their OS with better battery life + great response + little troubles(stability). If you disagree, I will just respond with "Galaxy S". |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Well yeah OK 2Ghz sounds good to me, but only if it can actually deliver something unique.
And running Android, I doubt it can really deliver much of anything interesting... |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
2Ghz phone lol hahahahaha sorry it's going to fail badly.
2Ghz processor wll drain batter size 1500mAh as quickly as a piece of ice cube in the microwave. Unless Motorolla wants to put 3000mAh battery in its device to substain the hungry beast Processor. Dual core may be the best option to this, unless PCworld wrongly adding dual core A9 1Ghz together into 2Ghz. Otherwise it will fall into an ocean. Tablet = may be, phone single CPU 2Ghz = I smelled burning hot phone. The question is, is Motorolla trying to build a phone or a piece of useless brick? Ghz isn't everything and isn't the solution. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
I'd be interested in seeing what Motorola plans on using, seeing as how they're long time customers TI, just like Nokia. That said, I wouldn't buy one since it'll just be crippled out of the gate like every other Motorola phone. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
All the rumours all talking about early next year.... i guess it's the same as N9 that according to Nokia will be released this year, but rumours are pointing to early next year. ;) Motorola’s Tegra 2 powered Droid Terminator coming to multiple carriers early 2011? http://www.devicemag.com/2010/10/12/...re-processors/ Might not be interested about the dual core Moto but if N9 isn't what i'm looking for will definitely be looking to Android+gingerbread+Cortex-A9 direction. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
These 2ghz phones appear to be dual core. Some have dubbed the first 2ghz phone from Motorola as the Motorola Olympus and also goes by the name Droid Terminator or T2. These 2ghz "phones" may also have been rumored to be Tablets instead. Which makes more sense to me but you never know how the smarphone market will change.
Some links for funsies: http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Moto...e-a_13961.html http://www.electronista.com/articles...ertifications/ |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
In Finnish only, and well, you know, it's funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsxlJtImklg Yes, in a few years most of the gadgets and electronics you own right now will be in the garbage. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
My N64 is 64bit and it's much better than 2ghz Motorola at the end of 2010.
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
i like this high cpu wave too.
but for me it would be better if they would make a really ****ing great battery. something with 5000mah. i would pay 150 euro for such a battery if i could use it in my n900 |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
read on google that 2007 would be the end of the world. Never trust google.
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
that was awesome. all in panic because someone has talked ****. great.... |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
or the mellenium bug crises :) wait for the N9 and motorola before speaking...
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Until we can create software to use all the cores ghz IS important. The N900 loads/renders web-pages way too slowly. And when external HDMI screens can be connected that speed will be even more important.
Furthermore, don't make the mistake of assuming the current OMAP's battery efficiency will hold for the next generation of chips. The upcoming chips run at high speed, are polycoreus AND have a longer battery life. The idea that chip speed doesn't matter because "software should be optimized" begs the question; people are talking about the SAME level of optimization on a faster chip. Thus, faster experience and better UX. Are you thinking that developers will "unoptimize" the code so that it will still perform poorly on faster hardware? We're unlikely to do that. |
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
|
Re: 2ghz phone by end of 2010
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8