![]() |
useless tags
I thought tags in the posts were a useful way of searching. But obviously this "mature" community has completely sabotaged that by using tags as a way to "comment" on posts. Isn't there any administrator here to clean things up? Just wondering.
|
Re: useless tags
Yeah, god forbid someone do something you wouldn't do! Let's get the admin team in here to enforce your opinons.
|
Re: useless tags
Would be nice if everyone could see who set any particular tag on a given thread, perhaps then adding childish tags would not be so popular.
|
Re: useless tags
i've never tried searching for tags on here, cant imagine it'd work no matter how anal you want to be about it, the freeflow of ideas and suggestions cannot be conveniently pigeonholed and then searched for by people who havent had the same thoughts and ideas. if you have a problem you need fixed searcing by title and post content would be more than sufficient. so what exactly are the tags good for? alternative expression, humorous affect, comic relief and (semi) anonymous commentary. i like them as they are.
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
The fact that you can actually get a lot of useful information from t.m.o. is noteworthy. |
Re: useless tags
It would probably work better if it was more wiki-like, having everyone be able to edit every tag
|
Re: useless tags
"<talk.maemo.org>
This thread already has the maximum number of tags and you are not allowed to edit any existing tags." :( I'm 41 and I still find some of the tags hilarious. Even better that it's anonymous :) As has already been said, it's not really worth using the tags for searching - just use Google and add "site:talk.maemo.org" to your search to restrict it to these forums. |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
crappy thread will result in crappy post will result in crappy tags. Great threads get great tags!
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Tag fest ftw!!!
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
An alternative conclusion is all crap is gold. |
Re: useless tags
obviously a thread attacking the use of tags is going to invoke an abuse of tags by those in support of said abuse. the fact they've maxed out suggests the masses have spoken. mark it down to character, immaturity, stupidity, or low level humour if you will. but i and others like it. they really wouldn't be effective for search in practice, so why not use them as stylised commentary? so much of the internet's little gems have arisen in such a manner.
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
And this forum has had its own influx of jackasses as well as a mass exodus of useful folks. Here's an image to explain what I mean. |
Re: useless tags
You aren't still upset about
never happy, op is a bumder, op is a douche, op is an idiot, op is on rag, op needs a slap, op suckstags added to your MMS thread are you? |
Re: useless tags
Please tell me that you didn't memorize those tags...
|
Re: useless tags
came here for the stupid tags, leaving satisfied
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
Second, it is anonymity that allows me to be normal, free from all the stupid restrictions I follow in society otherwise. I "shitcock" is the right word to be said, then I am ****ing relieved to be able to ****ing say it. |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
The tags are representative of the influx of jackasses. The useful people post less. The tags are the indicator. The exodus of useful posters is more true than false. Simply put. If this were a vintage coal mine, the birds will have flown away, the poisonous gases are mounting, people are oblivious to that and are too ****ing busy paying attention to semantics and other banal observations instead of looking at what is truly happening. Tags are not the cause. They're the indicator of what's here now. Savvy? |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Thank you all.
This thread did not disappoint :) |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
Humor tags don't affect your searches one bit, as long as there are also relevant tags as well. We've already had this debate, anyway. The sourpusses lost. |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
an enumerated glossary on each profile showing the tags each profile has used and in what frequency: 99 BrickFactory 15 cynic 13 cr@p 9 useless 2 @b0rtion have a sense of humor anyways:D |
Re: useless tags
I've commented about this before deep in another thread. Here's my opinion in TL;DR version:
Shitty and anal tags can be a problem. I've seen plenty of times when they're just indicative of someone self-righteous and oh-so-superior feeling like it's appropriate to voice something mocking/insulting. And as far as I'm concerned it is never good for unproductive dickery to be acceptable, no matter how little harm it does in that instance, because it's accepting a mentality that causes issues both in the real world and on the internet. However, the degree to which anal tags are a problem varies with the usefulness of the post. There's plenty of times when these tags are mocking and self-supperior, but the OP/thread is really deserving of it, and/or the thread contains nothing useful. In practice, I realize that the above ideal of countering needless dickery doesn't actually gain much of anything by forcing significant tag moderation. The underlying problems (people being dicks when it's not a poignant way to express something, but just for the sake of it or for their amusement; the growing ratio of snide and hostile members to truly helpful ones), still remain. I would be in favor of non-anonimization of the tags - you still have your nickname to keep you truly anonymous, and your IPs aren't publicly visible anyway. And if that's not enough there's Tor and being able to route your traffic through remote servers, etc. If someone has the skill to find you past that point, you're probably dealing with someone who's not interested in what you tagged a thread with. But ultimately, I think it's really only an actual problem when threads with useful information get tagged with only uselessness indicating tags. And contrary to what Texrat's comment suggests, that does happen often. Not enough people add useful tags. But I don't view it as enough of an issue to require admin attention. There's plenty of forum members who can edit the tags themselves (You get that ability after some post amount). Indeed, I've seen it in action on some threads, which I'm guessing wasn't all moderators/admins. |
Re: useless tags
OMG people... Why are you digging too deep into it? They're just tags - how come some of the comments in this thread are longer than 5 lines?
Btw, I was concerned about the amount of funny tags this thread might have when I first read it, but was relieved to see that there is a sufficient amount of them ;) |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
I would hope my fellow moderators do the same. Solved. |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
:) Ahhh, look at the tags now :) The air is fresh, the grass is green, the sun is shining, fishes are jumping, birds are singing, girls are smiling :D
This is much nicer, and we are all happier :D |
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Quote:
|
Re: useless tags
Cowboys and hamburgers = Romeo and Juliet :D Ahh such romance...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8