maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Competitors (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Bada 2.0.1 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=73676)

ericsson 2011-06-01 17:52

Bada 2.0.1
 
Bada 2.0.1 is just around the corner. :)

http://www.gsmarena.com/bada_201_os_...-news-2720.php

Totally rewamped and full multitasking (at last)

Nothing else to say except - Bada Rox :D

Deaconclgi 2011-06-01 18:08

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
It looks like......Gingerbread.......on the Galaxy SII....yet with the font from the Memoir....

SalmanAbbas 2011-06-01 18:11

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Cant they think up better names?

ericsson 2011-06-02 07:17

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Deaconclgi (Post 1020351)
It looks like......Gingerbread.......on the Galaxy SII....yet with the font from the Memoir....

Samsung use the same UI on all phones. The difference with Bada vs Android is that Bada is much faster and smoother and instead of 2 days battery life you have 2 weeks (a month standby, but of course dependent on use).

Daneel 2011-06-02 07:25

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
It looks better then android to me but where did you get those battery life numbers from, they seem far fetched?

ericsson 2011-06-02 07:43

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daneel (Post 1020727)
It looks better then android to me but where did you get those battery life numbers from, they seem far fetched?

I have had my Wave for half a year now, and the numbers are ballpark from experience, but you can also read them in the specs. But they are very dependent on use, the Wave has a 1 GHz processor, and at full throttle it drains battery like the best of them. The difference is that Bada use a real OS, not a bloated *UX meant for servers. The point is, Bada is not extremely good on battery life, Android/Maemo etc is extremely bad, to the point of lunacy.

However, 2.0 comes with full multitasking, so I would expect battery life to be somewhat less, but not much and more dependent on use cases.

ericsson 2011-06-02 07:55

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
From GSMArena:

Battery Standard battery, Li-Ion 1500 mAh
Stand-by Up to 600 h (2G) / Up to 550 h (3G)
Talk time Up to 15 h (2G) / Up to 7 h (3G)
Music play Up to 35 h

My experience is that standby on 3g is a bit less.

Daneel 2011-06-02 07:57

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Thats all nice and dandy, but i doubt i'd get more then 24 hours of battery life with my usage pattern on any smartphone on the market atm and you are throwing out numbers like 2 weeks? Seems like a wild exaggeration to me.

qwazix 2011-06-02 09:29

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
The omia HD also had very good battery life. 3 days is pretty easy with some calls, a couple hours browsing every day, notes and calendar,
And the phone has about the same specs as the N900.

Bundyo 2011-06-02 18:50

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qwazix (Post 1020793)
The omia HD also had very good battery life. 3 days is pretty easy with some calls, a couple hours browsing every day, notes and calendar,
And the phone has about the same specs as the N900.

Yeah, and had Symbian :)

cfh11 2011-06-02 18:55

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
this may be a competitor to iCrap, but its got nuthin on Maemo/Meego

ericsson 2011-06-02 20:09

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cfh11 (Post 1021196)
this may be a competitor to iCrap, but its got nuthin on Maemo/Meego

The way Nokia is going in the latest press releases I think it is safe to say that more Maemo/Meego devices is not going to happen. It is over, the end is here.

Bada is an alternative, it is THE alternative to Android/iOS/WP, at least the only alternative with a future. Bada is one thing, it is all Samsung at the moment, but the core OS is unstoppable in the long run, just as WP is.

HellFlyer 2011-06-02 21:10

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
So OP is the person who was trolling tags with stupid bada rox tag? Good to know

HellFlyer 2011-06-02 21:18

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cfh11 (Post 1021196)
this may be a competitor to iCrap, but its got nuthin on Maemo/Meego

Bada is not used in high end devices it is designed to compete with Symbian

ericsson 2011-06-02 21:26

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
One problem remains. Still nothing out there to replace my ancient N900

Frappacino 2011-06-03 04:32

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cfh11 (Post 1021196)
this may be a competitor to iCrap, but its got nuthin on Maemo/Meego

yea - iCrap and Bada are out there in the market on phones that are sold.

Maemo/Meego are both dead.

So yea, you cant compare them.

ericsson 2011-06-03 21:41

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HellFlyer (Post 1021269)
Bada is not used in high end devices it is designed to compete with Symbian

That sentence is too lame to comment. Bada is based on Nucleus RTOS. It is a platform on that OS that gives Bada devices smartphone capabilities (third party apps) and with the Samsung UI touch wiz or whatever UI they chose.

Nucleus RTOS has been around for ages, and is used on all Samsung dumbphones as well as lots of others and GPS and all sort of gadgets and embedded systems.

Bada is a Samsung thing, Nucleus is available for everyone.

HellFlyer 2011-06-05 01:49

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ericsson (Post 1021900)
That sentence is too lame to comment. Bada is based on Nucleus RTOS. It is a platform on that OS that gives Bada devices smartphone capabilities (third party apps) and with the Samsung UI touch wiz or whatever UI they chose.

Nucleus RTOS has been around for ages, and is used on all Samsung dumbphones as well as lots of others and GPS and all sort of gadgets and embedded systems.

Bada is a Samsung thing, Nucleus is available for everyone.

Thank you kind sir for your deep and thorough knowledge.... Lol are you crazy or something? Who talked about RTOS or Nucleus or whatever else is there????? Never thought I would see a Samsung/Bada fanboy... :eek:

Samsung is using Bada to compete with Symbian aka low/mid range market , all of their high end phones run Android.....end of story

JamesBond@ge 2011-06-05 07:54

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
LOL Erriccson just done got himself owned haha.

Bada <> Symbian

jakiman 2011-06-05 08:27

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SalmanAbbas (Post 1020352)
Cant they think up better names?

Bada means Sea/Ocean in Korean. Not bad considering it is very easy to remember and pronounce even by non-Koreans. :p

ejasmudar 2011-06-05 09:40

Re: Bada 2.0.1
 
hmmm, to me bada always sounded like they were going for 'badass os' but chickened out in the end.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8