![]() |
Geeksphone Zero
http://www.geeksphone.com/en/moviles/zero/
Edit: correct ram info |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Android...
***yawn*** When will manufacturers learn, you can throw as much hardware as you like at a concept but when you cripple it with a sh|te OS it is meaningless. Who the fck is this joke marketed at anyway? 1. A true geek wouldn't have such lame hardware. They would buy the most powerful, rootable thing possible. 2. Geeks are not into the social networking fad and have not forgotten rule #1 of the internet, DONT TELL THEM YOUR REAL NAME! |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Mmm. Is this in any way different from other Android phones?
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
I thought it was a nexus one at first sight...
um...where is the geekiness, excatly?... |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Crap, the One has resistive screen and stylus but only ARM11 and 3MP cam.
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Quote:
I've asked about the list of closed source drivers ;) |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
256MB of RAM is what I see. Along with a shite ARM11 processor, we do not have a winner.
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
this thing is so bollocks it makes chuck norris's bollocks look small
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
ARM11 and 256MB RAM? Let's port Symbian to this - it's better HW than most Nokia Symbian phones ever had (N97 *cough*)! Hmm... btw... where's that "I can port Symbian to N900!"-guy? He would be very helpful. ROFL...
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Quote:
Actually you were correct on this one. It is 256 MB |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Quote:
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
For a device to be a "geekphone" it must have minimum of 1024mb of ram, if it aint got that then forget it.
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Complain all you want, but a device developed in this manner would be WAY more likely to see a non-Android platform come to it than any phone released by a major vendor.
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Quote:
|
Re: Geeksphone Zero
I fail to see how is it a geek's phone if the technical specifications on their site is even specific right down to the chipsets used for WLAN, bluetooth, etc, etc, etc. Yet their branding is quite deceiving for what labels one as a geek.
Also their technical specifications are nowhere near as powerful as the android phones on the high tier. That is not something that a geek would actually want in fact. I'm sure geeks are very trendy people. Maybe in a nutshell the phones they sell are really for those geeks on budget? I can only see low-mid tier range from these phones. No dual core, a measly 256MB of RAM with 512MB EEPROM, 802.11b/g (no 802.11n), bluetooth v2.1 and no hardware keyboard. Its also funny to note that their previous phone, aka geekphone one has a hardware keyboard but this `zero' version doesn't. |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
Quote:
I'm shocked that people are dumping on them, despite doing what no other handset vendor would do and what OpenMoko never succeeded at. I'll definitely keep my eye on their next hardware revision, with luck they'll leapfrog the N900 and come out with something slick next revision. |
Re: Geeksphone Zero
If its open hardware i wouldn't mind a lower speced device although this is too low.
I hope their next iteration includes a hardware keyboard. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8