![]() |
Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
This got me curious... how do you unlock older NITs?
EDIT: Forgot to add the link: http://www.gsmarena.com/apple_grante...-news-3307.php |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
slide key, no onscreen thingy.
We are lucky Apple didn't patent the on-off switch, the keyboard, or the human-device interaction. |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
I don't understand how you can patent digital mecanisms that mimic unpatented real life mecanisms.
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
As for the patent, it seems it only has legs in the US with their known-broken patent system: Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Recently, there was some "America Invents" act passed that changes the US system from first-to-invent to first-to-file IIRC. Let's wait and see.
EDIT: oh my, Samsung (or the blogger?) even demonstrated prior art using a screenshot of an Terratec EWX control panel which is NOT the mentioned Native Instruments Guitar Rig: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-G_MFyfkRWz...screenshot.png |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
But most of Apple's relevant touch screen patents were filed after 2005 anyway. The big takeaway is that Maemo 4 doesn't have the patent problems of Android. |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
it seems that patent system's going towards the wrong direction... are manufacturers supposed to check all filed patents before they make real products with innovative features? apple seems to be claiming too much. (or they're just receiving too much exposure from the press?)
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Quote:
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
The patent must be invalidated in the US as well, based on the prior art.
See this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj-KS...layer_embedded The funny thing is, I remember reading about the Neonode before even it was released, and that there was hype building up about it -- and then suddenly it faded away. Seems that the iPhone stole a lot of its thunder, as well as a few seminal ideas... I applaud Google for pissing all over the broken patent system. If not them, manufacturers in Asia are going to do it anyway. If you have an invention, make a product, sell it and profit -- or go pound sand. |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
i think the whole patent system s**ks especially slide to unlock, clock designs, GUI interface or bla bla ... jus a big lol for them making this stuff patent...
i think; then everything shown on a fiction film should be patented because they had that idea or vision before anyone else did... |
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Go team USA!
|
Re: Apple Patented "Slide to Unlock" - Question for older NIT owners
Just another example of how the patent system is broken and how corporations just slow things down.
Yay. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8