maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Nokia N900 (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=44)
-   -   Musings (un)related to Neo900 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=91725)

daperl 2013-11-04 14:20

Musings (un)related to Neo900
 
Can someone explain the logo to me please. Why is the screaming phoenix going back into the fire? Shouldn't it be rising from the ashes? I don't want this project to crash and burn. Thanks in advance.

http://static.neo900.org/openphoenux.png

daperl 2013-11-04 14:29

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dos1 (Post 1384307)
I always thought that at the bottom there's a tail, and the head is on top

Whoa, really? I guess I can see that, but at first glance it looks to me like it's dive bombing.

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 15:04

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daperl (Post 1384306)
Can someone explain the logo to me please. Why is the screaming phoenix going back into the fire? Shouldn't it be rising from the ashes? I don't want this project to crash and burn. Thanks in advance.

http://static.neo900.org/openphoenux.png

LOL, you evidently watched too many toons in TV. What you think was the head is actually the tail of the bird, with a few flames around it. It's an elegant jetlike bird going up, not a toon character going down.
Anyway thanks for bringing it up, I guess the artist (whoever it been) can change that logo so it's less tempting to toon fans to misinterprete it ;-)

/j

rasmarc 2013-11-04 17:09

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
the curved side of the wings is where the bird's tail is. :cool:

Coretech 2013-11-04 17:35

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
I love the idea but i hate the choices of cases. The neo freerunner had an odd case so i didn't buy it. Now the Neo900 has a keyboard and i will not buy it because of that. Why not base it on a rectangular-ish case like iphone or simular. I bet it would make alot more people buy it.

Dave999 2013-11-04 17:39

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coretech (Post 1384347)
I love the idea but i hate the choices of cases. The neo freerunner had an odd case so i didn't buy it. Now the Neo900 has a keyboard and i will not buy it because of that. Why not base it on a rectangular-ish case like iphone or simular. I bet it would make alot more people buy it.

I respect you opinion but you have plenty of choice like nexus & Co. I'm glade they went for a keyboard device. There are simply too few. Or none ;)

Coretech 2013-11-04 17:49

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave999 (Post 1384348)
I respect you opinion but you have plenty of choice like nexus & Co. I'm glade they went for a keyboard device. There are simply too few. Or none ;)

A truly open smartphone (with open source firmware for the gsm modem) does not exist of today that i know of. The ultimate phone would be a phone with the hardware of the Neo900 (with osmocom firmware) and a rectangular case. But that's just wishful thinking. I bet the next Neo phone will be spherical :)

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 17:54

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so. I'd appreciate when you simply would delete your posts. They are incorreect and OT.

Coretech 2013-11-04 18:25

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joerg_rw (Post 1384353)
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate.

It's surely only illegal in the US :D The rest of the world would enjoy the open source/NSA free gsm stack. Sorry for the off-topic messages.

Ken-Young 2013-11-04 18:28

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joerg_rw (Post 1384353)
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate.

Is it actually illegal to release the source code for a GSM stack?

nokiabot 2013-11-04 18:32

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
theres no india :(

dos1 2013-11-04 18:34

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coretech (Post 1384362)
It's surely only illegal in the US :D The rest of the world would enjoy the open source/NSA free gsm stack. Sorry for the off-topic messages.

Actually, no. Certification issues make the device without it (so for instance, with replaced firmware) illegal to operate on public networks in most countries on the world. Of course you can use it on your own network - for which you need a permission to run :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken-Young (Post 1384364)
Is it actually illegal to release the source code for a GSM stack?

Releasing the source code is not illegal, but see above.

Also, see https://trisquel.info/en/forum/true-...eo900-openmoko
I've wrote a bit about it there.

Hopefully that answers your questions. If not, I'll be happy to talk with you, but in some different topic please - don't make mess in this one.

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 18:36

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so. I'd appreciate when you simply would delete your posts. They are incorreect and OT.

Daneel 2013-11-04 18:37

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Coretech (Post 1384350)
The ultimate phone would be a phone with the hardware of the Neo900 (with osmocom firmware) and a rectangular case. But that's just wishful thinking. I bet the next Neo phone will be spherical :)

My ultimate phone has a hardware keyboard and i'm pretty sure people like me are the target group for this project since it obviously is an upgrade to the N900, which had a hardware keyboard.

Now, if only my monthly salary was not 350 euro :D

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 18:46

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so. I'd appreciate when you simply would delete your posts. They are incorrect and OT.

szopin 2013-11-04 18:51

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joerg_rw (Post 1384371)
Please stay on topic! On a sidenote a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so. I'd appreciate when you simply would delete your posts. They are incorrect and OT.

Is this default answer Goldelico forces you to use whenever anyone asks about GSM stack? Screw the NSA-free part? I'll answer myself:

a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so.

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 18:55

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
@mods
PLEASE NUKE THE LAST 20orso POSTS!
thanks!

joerg_rw 2013-11-04 21:08

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
btw the NSA doesn't need or want a spyware in the GSM firmware. As long as the modem works, it already does what the NSA needs, without any malware or patches. When somebody wants to spy on you, they need to make the phone pretend it's off while it isn't. For Neo900 this means they must place some spyware/malware on the linux system, not on the modem. The linux system is completely FOSS and under user's total absolute control. When the modem is off, then it's off, no malware inside modem could power it up on remote command. And particularly it could never start transmitting any data without the linux system noticing that. So it's up to user(land) to keep an eye on modem and holler when it acts strange.

On a sidenote: afaik all contemporary modem chipsets are tivoized. You can't run any firmware on them that's not signed by the owner of the private signature key, i.e. the chip manuf. Even the calypso had that option but TI didn't use it.
/j

joerg_rw 2013-11-05 16:35

Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by szopin (Post 1384372)
Is this default answer Goldelico forces you to use whenever anyone asks about GSM stack? Screw the NSA-free part? I'll answer myself:

a phone with FOSS GSM stack is illegal to operate, everywhere except in anarchies where they won't have any network provider to use it in. Please stop spreading false claims here! A GSM stack needs certification and that has to be done even by the network operators. Operating a transmitter is basically illegal everywhere on the world without a licence to do so.

which pretty fine shows what I failed to transport to your mind: STAY ON TOPIC is what you evidently missed to read and understand its meaning.

Dave999 2013-11-05 18:26

Re: Musings (un)related to Neo900
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by daperl (Post 1384306)
Can someone explain the logo to me please. Why is the screaming phoenix going back into the fire? Shouldn't it be rising from the ashes? I don't want this project to crash and burn. Thanks in advance.

http://static.neo900.org/openphoenux.png

Its a burning broken NSA antenna telling the users its NSA free...

http://falkvinge.net/files/2013/07/P...61-646x363.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8